Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gueye leaves.
Are we better or worse?
Fair play then. I don't see it but if you rate a Delph Gomes midfield that's fine by me.Im going with better.
Fair play then. I don't see it but if you rate a Delph Gomes midfield that's fine by me.
He’s been great and proved a lot wrong very quickly.
Can we replace him like for like, am going with no.
Can we buy someone who will offer something different but could add more balance to the midfield? Yes.
My choice would be a midfield of Andre Gomes, Fabian Delph and Frank Kessie.
Im going with better.
But where do you fit Sigurdsson into that side? I think Gueye is integral for Sigurdsson & Gomes to play in midfield.
Gomes could definitely move into a 3 as above but not Sigurdsson. And unless we sign a fool proof striker (not possible), I think Sigurdsson is still going to be extremely important to us next season.
I think Delph and Gomes offers us more than Gana and Gomes.
What we lose in defence, we gain in attack.
Gana is a superb player, but hes very limited, Delph offers more, we will concede more, but score more, provided he stays fit.
But our manager has claimed when Gana leaves, he will be replaced not by Delph, believe dat when I see it like.
Im a positive person, I dont think OMG we cant lose Gana, I think we can improve BY selling Gana, I want the boy to live his dreams.
He does what he does well, but it's not necessarily better for the team. That happens. I don't think we've ever really found a balance for any length of time with him in the side, and I've said before, having a midfield 3 with him and Sigurdsson is just a nightmare that often leaves us badly exposed. It's all about balance. And if we sell him and he has paid for Gomez and Delph, with possibly more left over, then that to me is good business.
Well the last part I agree with. If the offer is really there he should be allowed to go.I think Delph and Gomes offers us more than Gana and Gomes.
What we lose in defence, we gain in attack.
Gana is a superb player, but hes very limited, Delph offers more, we will concede more, but score more, provided he stays fit.
But our manager has claimed when Gana leaves, he will be replaced not by Delph, believe dat when I see it like.
Im a positive person, I dont think OMG we cant lose Gana, I think we can improve BY selling Gana, I want the boy to live his dreams.
I'd imagine we'll have Delph as a fairly safe bet to come in and not be rubbish, then buy another younger, less proven but potentially more talented player to be his actual replacement.
Well the last part I agree with. If the offer is really there he should be allowed to go.
But that midfield trying to shutdown counters is a terrifying thought. The problem is last year Gana did the job of him and Andre. Gomes was good at pressuring and winning the ball back but he struggled when teams broke and that showed massively when Gana was out. Can Delph cover that same way? I doubt it.
We only gain in attack if Delph is allowed to push on. Last year our midfielders weren't really pushing in very much and that to me felt more like the system than them not choosing too. Which is ultimate why I'd really want Gueye to stay. Because he was a key cog in a system that probably needs to be redone without him. So as I said orginally losing him impedes our progress at least initially.
The other thing is Marco claims we will be getting another CM if he goes. And that's great but we are starting to get to the area of huge squad turnover especially if Zouma isn't back and a different CB is signed. All of the changes push us closer to square one like the start of last year.