TheFinnFan
Finners
He's not back yet. He's back when his back is back to proper condition. Lets back Garner and his back and hope he's back soon.How is his back?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's not back yet. He's back when his back is back to proper condition. Lets back Garner and his back and hope he's back soon.How is his back?
What's he do then?I reckon you’ve seen him play for about a combined 20 minutes in your life.
What's he do then?
The last time we saw him he was completely below the level on display in a game between our sorry team and Bournemouth. I'm just not sure why anyone thinks he should be playing or that playing him would fix anything.
It's a complete Lucas Leiva situation.
Yes in fact it is actually different as they are all different players.So you were quite happy to ignore Iwobi being absolute AIDS for 3 years and do nothing but make excuses for him but will happily write Garner off after an hour of football, got ya.
Also, Dwight McNeil just needs to be played in the right set up bro. Garner thought, nah. Different rules innit.
Yes in fact it is actually different as they are all different players.
Can you just tell me what it is Garner is meant to do so in the event he plays again I can look out for it?
I don't think McNeil is any good mate I'd just like to see us try something that might work instead of the things we have seen over those 140 games be awful. I'm just as willing to move him to LB but we were smacking ourselves silly over Mykolenko and the backline in general only a month or so ago so that didn't look likely to happen.I’m not pretending to be an expert on James Garner am I? I’m just not writing him off after playing 60 minutes in the league cup. You however seem to be willing to write off McNeil’s 140 games of being diabolical because he’s never once played in the exact right system with the exact players he needs around him.
I don't think McNeil is any good mate I'd just like to see us try something that might work instead of the things we have seen over those 140 games be awful. I'm just as willing to move him to LB but we were smacking ourselves silly over Mykolenko and the backline in general only a month or so ago so that didn't look likely to happen.
So anyway I think we agree Garner isn't good at anything. Or at least nothing is immediately apparent.
Garner is defo high potential. Unfortunate injury
Him and Onana
Garner isn't good at anything
I reckon you’ve seen him play for about a combined 20 minutes in your life.
What's he do then?
The last time we saw him he was completely below the level on display in a game between our sorry team and Bournemouth. I'm just not sure why anyone thinks he should be playing or that playing him would fix anything.
It's a complete Lucas Leiva situation.
The rules really aren't different. Some players I see traits in that I think can maybe be applied and some I just don't. I've asked several times now if you see any glimpses of what Garner is meant to do and you've not provided even a hint of an answer so as I said you actually seem to hold the same viewpoint I do. I think there's more potential in Patterson than Mykolenko as another example and that has nothing to do with me and everything to do with them as players. With Garner I simply don't see much as I didnt and don't with Mykolenko. Maybe I'll be wrong.There’s nothing immediately apparent to suggest that McNeil would be any good moved to left back, or would be any good under a manager that plays whatever the correct style in your head is? Should we maybe try Garner in a team that is set up correctly rather than the 60 minutes (as opposed to 140 games) of the Bournemouth game that you seem to be judging him definitively on? Do you see how the rules are different for each player here or am I banging my head against a wall?
There’s nothing immediately apparent to suggest that McNeil would be any good moved to left back, or would be any good under a manager that plays whatever the correct style in your head is? Should we maybe try Garner in a team that is set up correctly rather than the 60 minutes (as opposed to 140 games) of the Bournemouth game that you seem to be judging him definitively on? Do you see how the rules are different for each player here or am I banging my head against a wall?
Garner isn't good at anything
You do realise this makes no sense, because “what garner is supposed to do” is dependent on the system as well.The rules really aren't different. Some players I see traits in that I think can maybe be applied and some I just don't. I've asked several times now if you see any glimpses of what Garner is meant to do and you've not provided even a hint of an answer so as I said you actually seem to hold the same viewpoint I do. I think there's more potential in Patterson than Mykolenko as another example and that has nothing to do with me and everything to do with them as players. With Garner I simply don't see much as I didnt and don't with Mykolenko. Maybe I'll be wrong.
He's not back yet. He's back when his back is back to proper condition. Lets back Garner and his back and hope he's back soon.