Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is a wonderful unbiased spot mate. ?Completely agree mate must be a Benitez problem and not a james problem for sure..
View attachment 139182
“I didn’t want James to leave,” the Frenchman [Zidane] insisted on Tuesday, the day before his side’s first-leg meeting with Bayern at the Allianz Arena. “He decided to go. He wanted to play more regularly, and I can understand that.”
“I’ve never had any problem with James, despite what the media might say,” Zidane added. “There are some very important players in this team, but it’s always the same, some of them miss out.”
As me and you know mate, we have exactly the same problem as Madrid, as our squad and Madrids are practically the same in terms of quality.“He will certainly be motivated, but that’s because he’s a football player,” Zidane said. “He doesn’t have to prove anything to anyone – and anyone who thinks I’m against James is wrong. He will want to go out and prove himself simply because he loves football.”
He training this week again?
You maybe haven't said those exact words, but that is essentially what some of us are being asked to do in here.I have never said follow him blindly, I do think he’ll be judged on results that’s all
He will proberly do that to make sure he gets paid, but then cant be bothered taking a place onthe bench.He training this week again?
This just goes to show how completely out of touch you are with James Rodriguez and Everton Football Club.No, he’s got time off to appear on Love Island.
It was written into his contract.
Once he played 3 games last season, it activated a release clause for him to make a guest appearance on the show.
That’s the way it happens with any manager and you’re right it won’t changeYou maybe haven't said those exact words, but that is essentially what some of us are being asked to do in here.
I'm prepared to give credit where credit is due, and have done on numerous times already. But I'm not going to ignore mistakes he makes like starting 3 at the back against Burnley. If, and I say if because I'm still giving him the benefit of the doubt on this, he is refusing to play James purely because he doesn't trust him, then that's unprofessional of him and it needs saying.
You are correct in saying he will be judged on results but he will also be judged on performance. He's doing well with both so far and long may it continue. But if standards drop and James is still being excluded, expect fans reaction to change.
You maybe haven't said those exact words, but that is essentially what some of us are being asked to do in here.
I'm prepared to give credit where credit is due, and have done on numerous times already. But I'm not going to ignore mistakes he makes like starting 3 at the back against Burnley. If, and I say if because I'm still giving him the benefit of the doubt on this, he is refusing to play James purely because he doesn't trust him, then that's unprofessional of him and it needs saying.
You are correct in saying he will be judged on results but he will also be judged on performance. He's doing well with both so far and long may it continue. But if standards drop and James is still being excluded, expect fans reaction to change.
I agree the collective is more important than the individual. And I'm only asking for James to be given a chance to be part of the collective.That’s the way it happens with any manager and you’re right it won’t change
People are just waiting to us the ex Liverpool manager piece as a potential stick to beat him with.
All I say is forget James, let Benitiez make the calls, if it includes or excludes James so be it.
The collective is far more important
You maybe haven't said those exact words, but that is essentially what some of us are being asked to do in here.
I'm prepared to give credit where credit is due, and have done on numerous times already. But I'm not going to ignore mistakes he makes like starting 3 at the back against Burnley. If, and I say if because I'm still giving him the benefit of the doubt on this, he is refusing to play James purely because he doesn't trust him, then that's unprofessional of him and it needs saying.
You are correct in saying he will be judged on results but he will also be judged on performance. He's doing well with both so far and long may it continue. But if standards drop and James is still being excluded, expect fans reaction to change.
That's fair enough Khal.Barney, I agree with you that James should play a role for us and also that Raffles needs to be given a chance and that I was disappointed with the starting XI v Burnley.
However, if a manager doesn't "trust" a player then that manager, no matter who he is, will not play that player, no matter who he is.
Fan reaction will change regardless of James involvement.You maybe haven't said those exact words, but that is essentially what some of us are being asked to do in here.
I'm prepared to give credit where credit is due, and have done on numerous times already. But I'm not going to ignore mistakes he makes like starting 3 at the back against Burnley. If, and I say if because I'm still giving him the benefit of the doubt on this, he is refusing to play James purely because he doesn't trust him, then that's unprofessional of him and it needs saying.
You are correct in saying he will be judged on results but he will also be judged on performance. He's doing well with both so far and long may it continue. But if standards drop and James is still being excluded, expect fans reaction to change.
Think he set up for last season's Burnley. Couldn't believe how open their defence was this time out.You maybe haven't said those exact words, but that is essentially what some of us are being asked to do in here.
I'm prepared to give credit where credit is due, and have done on numerous times already. But I'm not going to ignore mistakes he makes like starting 3 at the back against Burnley. If, and I say if because I'm still giving him the benefit of the doubt on this, he is refusing to play James purely because he doesn't trust him, then that's unprofessional of him and it needs saying.
You are correct in saying he will be judged on results but he will also be judged on performance. He's doing well with both so far and long may it continue. But if standards drop and James is still being excluded, expect fans reaction to change.
Oh no, mate. When we have had managers playing the likes of Martina and Alcaraz the fans were very happy with this.That's fair enough Khal.
But it doesn't necessarily follow that fans have to take the side of the manager on this. Surely they have the right to determine if the manager is wrong to take such a stance. People who believe that James should be given an opportunity (within the matchday squad, I don't expect him to be a regular starter under Benitez) are being told by a minority on here to just accept it and move on. They're the people I'm arguing with.