evertonarntwe
Player Valuation: £35m
Being our best winger doesn't make you good...
Being our best winger means your better than Richarlison
So id say it does make you good tbf
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Being our best winger doesn't make you good...
By that definition isn't he also our only winger? Being the best winger in a field of 1 is not a challenging task.Well we’ll have to agree to disagree then as I’ve never considered Richarlison a winger. Even when he’s meant to play there he’s always inside.
Plus I never said he was better or preferable to any of them? I’d much rather Bernard over him (not Iwobi out wide) all I’m saying is he’s been a really effective actual winger this season for the most part. Start of the season he was our best player by a mile.
But how has he been our most "effective" winger when he hasn't scored a single goal this season?
He's had a handful of decent games but overall he's been poor, file under Morgan, siggy etc needs to go
By that definition isn't he also our only winger? Being the best winger in a field of 1 is not a challenging task.
You said you preferred him but that Walcott was doing better, I'm a little confused.Bernard is a winger?
You said you preferred him but that Walcott was doing better, I'm a little confused.
Definitely needs to go but it doesn’t mean for the most part he’s not played well. Again, same with Bernard, people need to stop staring at the goals/assists column to judge a player.
Bernard hasn't played much and when he has he hasn't looked fit imo. You also stated that Walcott was our best actual winger which implied the other playears in that post were not actual wingers, hence the confusion.In general I prefer what Bernard can bring but he’s not been as good this season. Not sure how that’s confusing.
Being our best winger means your better than Richarlison
So id say it does make you good tbf
Bernard hasn't played much and when he has he hasn't looked fit imo. You also stated that Walcott was our best actual winger which implied the other playears in that post were not actual wingers, hence the confusion.
Either way if Walcott is our best winger and we plan on playing wingers (Ancelotti's comment about more crosses would suggest they have some role to play) then we need new wingers. (I'm not sure I've ever used the word winger more in a sentence!)
Richarlison is not a winger.
He's played the majority of his time as a winger, he's just as much a winger as he is a number 9
Doesn’t matter, he’s clearly not a winger. He possesses none of the attributes of a winger.