Why do you personally think we didn't bring a striker in?
We had a budget for players which we spent and also spent the Rom money but after that we were not in a position to bring in a striker because Ross never went.
You might be right. But had we sold Barkley and bought a striker with the proceeds, we would still have had a net spend of over £40m. That is not sell to buy! With a sel lot buy position you either break even or make a profit. You don't spend £40m