efcjames
Player Valuation: £35m
What is happening!!
I go away for a few hours and 40 pages!!
*loud noises!!!!!*
Mata gave an unconvincing "no"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is happening!!
I go away for a few hours and 40 pages!!
*loud noises!!!!!*
I think he might need one considering how silly some people on here are acting. lol
What is happening!!
I go away for a few hours and 40 pages!!
*loud noises!!!!!*
Out of interest Esk, is there a reason both deals seem to be quite drawn out? Purely logistical?
Deals are far more complex than even 5 or 10 years ago. The old days of a chairman phoning another chairman and deciding to buy or sell are long gone.
Now we have CEOs, DoFs, Chairmen and managers pitching to agents and vice versa, if there's traction then an approach is made to the club. If the club are receptive there'll be a discussion over price. If that's looking ok then the club gives the buyer permission to speak directly to the player. If that goes OK then the real negotiations begin over salaries, bonuses, media rights etc. Player sponsors have to be informed, sometimes contracts re-negotiated if there's conflict between existing sponsors and those of the new club.
That combined with early stage leaks makes the process seem much longer than previously. It's in no-ones interests to prolong matters, it's just the way it is.
With Everton now pitching for players who 12 months ago would never have entertained the idea there's an added complexity of having to sell the vision, prove the funding and give ideas of who else is likely to join, so that's certainly a factor with ourselves.
...
With Everton now pitching for players who 12 months ago would never have entertained the idea there's an added complexity of having to sell the vision, prove the funding and give ideas of who else is likely to join, so that's certainly a factor with ourselves.
So the tradition of being Manchester United's feeder club with our best talent continues as we also continue to be a home for their unwanted/finished players.Jose likes Stones right?
Everton want Mata
Everton needs to find about 30 mio in non broadcast income to accommodate increases in wages
Solution : the two clubs agree to swap players . We pay Utd 25 mio. They pay us 50 mio. It's not netted off, it's full cash flows
Everton has got Mata and can book a 50 mio profit
NB : I picked those numbers because they 'look' about right. Theoretically we could drive short term profitability up to any number ( eg if we wanted 100 mio, we sell at that price and buy Mata at 75 mio...the latter cash flow is NOT a profit/loss item but the 100 mio is)
You are probably thinking why sell Stones? Answer : we need profit from player trading
You then say : why sell to Man U
Answer cause they have something we want
Kind of like fixed / floating interest rate swaps and the like in finance
Can you read?So the tradition of being Manchester United's feeder club with our best talent continues as we also continue to be a home for their unwanted/finished players.
Status quo it is then.
I'm not surprised, this forum is full of tossers!....He's not coming here.