toffee matt
Player Valuation: £60m
You been drinking again Bill ?
Heave night In the west end with Mike Parry and @Steve Wigan allegedly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You been drinking again Bill ?
Heave night In the west end with Mike Parry and @Steve Wigan allegedly
''Deffo allegedly because @Steve Wigan has never met him, just once at a show he shouted "will it make the West End Bill ?"
Don't understand the point of that question of course Johnson never got 120 Million, no one did,Did Johnson get 120m from Sky?
Essentially though we have an extra 40 mill a year to play with, while the debt at worse remains static at best has reduced by 20 mill - I suspect it has reduced and will continue to do so.
Regardless it's very manageable. But more importantly, it's less about what it means this year - which is very positive - our income has increased by a third, but the cumulative effect of this in seasons to come.
It's wholly TV based though so people are right to question the management behind the scenes, that said we tend to manage and balance our finances and football development better than most, which does indicate some positive management of resources and decision making. Commercially we are awfull. Seems we just thread water and wait for the sky golden egg!
Don't understand the point of that question of course Johnson never got 120 Million, no one did,
but he got the going rate like everyone else and we sold our best player nearly every year.
Isn't that good? And maybe why we bought a player for twenty eight million this year and are looking at a new ground.If your going on ratios we nearly had as much debt as income under Johnson.
Our current net debt is a quater of our annual income presently, before flogging anyone.
The point is if Johnson was in charge now we'd stil be looking at the same rosy figures. Kenwright has had nothing to do with the massive increase in turnover.Don't understand the point of that question of course Johnson never got 120 Million, no one did,
but he got the going rate like everyone else and we sold our best player nearly every year.
Sometimes I can't fathom why Bill gets no credit when we seem to be making massive jumps in revenue every few years!
Yeah but Johnson isn't in charge and here's no guarantee he'd have given us more or increased our income or taken more. We are in the position we are in, we are receiving the money we are, can't we just be content with that?The point is if Johnson was in charge now we'd stil be looking at the same rosy figures. Kenwright has had nothing to do with the massive increase in turnover.
Isn't that good? And maybe why we bought a player for twenty eight million this year and are looking at a new ground.
It could hardly be worse though. When the commercial income of the fourth most successful team in English football is worse than the likes of Norwich and Wolverhampton I'd say that is a pretty damning indictment of those in charge.Yeah but Johnson isn't in charge and here's no guarantee he'd have given us more or increased our income or taken more. We are in the position we are in, we are receiving the money we are, can't we just be content with that?