No, because he's badly gash.So, just for arguments sake, if Everton took him on loan for a year would you be OK with it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, because he's badly gash.So, just for arguments sake, if Everton took him on loan for a year would you be OK with it?
I think you know I was referring to your comment about innocent untill proved guilty, he might have avoided being charged but I think we can all agree he was up to no good, so as the hypothetical question it was meant to be, would you be OK with it?Griffiths at Everton get serious man.
Agreed but that wasn't the point!No, because he's badly gash.
The point is that was a bad example because taking his accusation aside there are another dozen reasons why Griffiths wouldn't be signed so let me put it another way-- If Griffiths was perfect in every other way but had been accused of contacting under age girls but had been investigated and completely exonerated by police why would you hold it against him, where does it end?Agreed but that wasn't the point!
Mate, he's a 31 year old man with a partner and 5 kids being sleazy/pervy with a young girl on social media,that's bad enough for anyone but when you're a public figure and are using that status to connect with young girls for questionable reasons you deserve to be punished and removed from your privileged position, there is no clouding of judgment regarding this lowlife he shouldn't be allowed to continue as a professional footballer, what message does turning a blind eye send out to young supporters he's meant to be a role model ffs.The point is that was a bad example because taking his accusation aside there are another dozen reasons why Griffiths wouldn't be signed so let me put it another way-- If Griffiths was perfect in every other way but had been accused of contacting under age girls but had been investigated and completely exonerated by police why would you hold it against him, where does it end?
Again going back to the Rangers players being a cused of singing sectarian songs, do you think they should all be tagged with being religious bigots and it affecting their careers despite them being exonerated and the recording being fake? No mate, let the law deal with it, accept it and move on, your dislike for him and Celtic are now actually clouding your general judgement and I actually thought you were above that.
Married footballer chatting to girls oa nline shockeroonee,Mate, he's a 31 year old man with a partner and 5 kids being sleazy/pervy with a young girl on social media,that's bad enough for anyone but when you're a public figure and are using that status to connect with young girls for questionable reasons you deserve to be punished and removed from your privileged position, there is no clouding of judgment regarding this lowlife he shouldn't be allowed to continue as a professional footballer, what message does turning a blind eye send out to young supporters he's meant to be a role model ffs.
I'll be amazed if any club will want to be associated with him in future, I don't get why he always gets portrayed in the media up here as some sort of maverick and bit of a character whenever his scummy behaviour is highlighted!
It's GOT's longest running feud. They're obviously going to shag each other eventually but this foreplay is amusing.The sexual tension between @larbert toffee and @Cork Evertonian is what keeps me coming on here.
Marvelous to see.
Aye OK, let's just dismiss it all as harmless fun then!!!Married footballer chatting to girls oa nline shockeroonee,
Aye but they'll still have to agree on who the giver/taker is!!It's GOT's longest running feud. They're obviously going to shag each other eventually but this foreplay is amusing.
Honestly don't know what you'd call it, don't understand social media, don't know if it's a real account or not don't really care other than anyone undergoing trial by media when they are being investigated perhaps you would like to tell us all exactly what you know for fact about the case without referring to jarg newspapers or fan sites.Aye OK, let's just dismiss it all as harmless fun then!!!
He isn't denying that it is his account or that it was him that was communicating with a 15 year old to get pics.Honestly don't know what you'd call it, don't understand social media, don't know if it's a real account or not don't really care other than anyone undergoing trial by media when they are being investigated perhaps you would like to tell us all exactly what you know for fact about the case without referring to jarg newspapers or fan sites.
He's not the brightest that's for sure.He isn't denying that it is his account or that it was him that was communicating with a 15 year old to get pics.
It's just the level of noncery that he's disputing!!
Unbelievable continuing to defend the undefendable, with some whataboutery thrown into the mix as well. Once again i'm outraged and appalled, but not in the slightest bit surprised, considering your blinkered pro Celtic agenda.The point is that was a bad example because taking his accusation aside there are another dozen reasons why Griffiths wouldn't be signed so let me put it another way-- If Griffiths was perfect in every other way but had been accused of contacting under age girls but had been investigated and completely exonerated by police why would you hold it against him, where does it end?
Again going back to the Rangers players being a cused of singing sectarian songs, do you think they should all be tagged with being religious bigots and it affecting their careers despite them being exonerated and the recording being fake? No mate, let the law deal with it, accept it and move on, your dislike for him and Celtic are now actually clouding your general judgement and I actually thought you were above that.