Lukaku

[madkiwi]

He is supposed to be back from Holiday July 30th I believe. So Thursday should be a good day. Let the Besic official announcement Monday or Tuesday hold you over.

That's assuming the deal has been arranged in his absence. I hope so, or it could be a couple more weeks. Just look at Bešić...

 

[Springhettios]

That's assuming the deal has been arranged in his absence. I hope so, or it could be a couple more weeks. Just look at Bešić...

I believe it is done or damn near. There has been so much talk and rumors and hinting of his return. Chelsea signing Drogba and Costa, our head recruiter talking of his return, etc. It's on!!!!

 

[EFCNIK]

Who the bloody hell is besic?

 

[TheFinnFan]

Who the bloody hell is besic?

Psycho-Mo, mate

 

[DrEFC]

I fear you're taking the word "behave" too literally.

@deipnosophist once made the same mistake when I told him to "behave". I wasn't in the mood for an argument or a debate, so I just let it lie.

Behave, ffs

It's common for us non-wools to tell somebody to behave when they're talking rubbish. Soz if I've just outed you as a wool mate xx

Sorry, L15 isn't wool territory. Plus I don't believe I was chatting rubbish. Kisses made it all better though x

 

[ForeverEverton]

I`ve seen reports this morning about Juventus and possibly Real Madrid are keen. Obv don't know if any of these are true. Get him signed FFS

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spor...ws/roberto-martinez-everton-make-sure-7517137

 

[Simon Smith]

Have we signed him up yet? how long does a flight take to get back from Thailand?

So many questions........

NOT ENOUGH ANSWERS!!

 

[Steve Wigan]

I fear you're taking the word "behave" too literally.

@deipnosophist once made the same mistake when I told him to "behave". I wasn't in the mood for an argument or a debate, so I just let it lie.

Behave, ffs

It's common for us non-wools to tell somebody to behave when they're talking rubbish. Soz if I've just outed you as a wool mate xx

Behave yourself.

 

[marty mcfly]

I fear you're taking the word "behave" too literally.

@deipnosophist once made the same mistake when I told him to "behave". I wasn't in the mood for an argument or a debate, so I just let it lie.

Behave, ffs

It's common for us non-wools to tell somebody to behave when they're talking rubbish. Soz if I've just outed you as a wool mate xx

Bollocks. You're being a condescending c**t when you use that word.

 

[Steve Wigan]

Bollocks. You're being a condescending c**t when you use that word.

I think he's trying to be elitist, but it hasn't worked.

 

[marty mcfly]

I think he's trying to be elitist, but it hasn't worked.

Exactly I have a mate who does the same thing when he no longer wants to argue. It doesn't half wind me up too.

 

[terraloon]

Whoever he is. I see his name regularly on here. He knows nothing.

There may well not be any issues in relation to UEFAs version of FFP but there certainly could be in relation to the PL version. Where there is a wage cap and in Everton's case that will be about £71 million up by £4 million from last season

I tried to point out to you last week that loan players such as Barry & Lukaka, would not have been on Evertons wage bill last season.

You then quoted the rules relating to the status of players (FIFA) and at the same time quoting from UEFAs FFP and club licensing but its the specific wage restrictions in the PL version that could cause an issue

As I stated earlier a player on loan remain on the payroll of the owning club.The two clubs come to an agreement as to what fee is charged and then the club issues an invoice . Most clubs loaning players out treat this type of income as transfer fee received .

The rules are quite clear in relation as to who pays the player.

10.5 of the FA`s Standardised Rules . These rules are applicable to clubs from the PL down to the Football Conference state (Steps 1-6) and it states :

" Any Club temporarily transferring a Players registration should invoice the receiving club in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. The player concerned should remain on the payroll of the Club holding his permanent registration for the period of the loan."

The signing of Barry will mean that his wage including any signing on fee, albeit probably considerably less than he received at Man City, will now fully appear as wages in Everton's accounts and should Lukaka sign his wages likewise appear in an area where there is a cap .

 

[Goat]

So my mate Damon on Twitter is correct about FFP?

I knew he was a good lad.

 

[terraloon]

So my mate Damon on Twitter is correct about FFP?

I knew he was a good lad.

It comes down to how close Everton were already to the cap, if they are able to add anything on to the allowable £4 million growth and also what the terms of the loans were.

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

There may well not be any issues in relation to UEFAs version of FFP but there certainly could be in relation to the PL version. Where there is a wage cap and in Everton's case that will be about £71 million up by £4 million from last season

I tried to point out to you last week that loan players such as Barry & Lukaka, would not have been on Evertons wage bill last season.

You then quoted the rules relating to the status of players (FIFA) and at the same time quoting from UEFAs FFP and club licensing but its the specific wage restrictions in the PL version that could cause an issue

As I stated earlier a player on loan remain on the payroll of the owning club.The two clubs come to an agreement as to what fee is charged and then the club issues an invoice . Most clubs loaning players out treat this type of income as transfer fee received .

The rules are quite clear in relation as to who pays the player.

10.5 of the FA`s Standardised Rules . These rules are applicable to clubs from the PL down to the Football Conference state (Steps 1-6) and it states :

" Any Club temporarily transferring a Players registration should invoice the receiving club in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. The player concerned should remain on the payroll of the Club holding his permanent registration or the period of the loan."

The signing of Barry will mean that his wage including any signing on fee, albeit probably considerably less than he received at Man City, will now fully appear as wages in Everton's accounts and should Lukaka sign his wages likewise appear in an area where there is a cap .

Them remaining on the parent clubs payroll doesn't necessarily mean that they're included in any FFP wages calculation though.

As in the FL this piece states that loan players wages are deducted from the parent clubs total.

http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/