He was actually Richarlisons man Tim.Coleman v Jimenez = bad organisation = poor coaching.
He should of a least blocked the run of Jiminez.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was actually Richarlisons man Tim.Coleman v Jimenez = bad organisation = poor coaching.
He was actually Richarlisons man Tim.
He should of a least blocked the run of Jiminez.
The players have to set themselves up though, Tim.
I'm 100% sure he didn't say to Coleman - stand three yards away from Jimenez, oh, and Richarlison, stand two yards behind him as well.
It's probably a mix of both but if our players literally need putting on the spot to be able to defend a set piece (which let's actually be honest, is not a new issue) then we've got far more many problems than Silva.
Win and he'll be hated? I know I don't live among RS fans (although you'd be surprised how many are coming out of the woodwork) but this RS thing is ridiculous.Poor bloke can't win on Wednesday, like.
Lose, and it could be a cricket score.
Win, and he'll be hated anyway.
Best we can hope for is a valiant erm, 2-1 City
hetion said:Just dropping in here to categorically state that Fonseca is a wildly better choice than Silva, if we plump for Silva it's because our board are STILL (!!!) stuck in the out-dated 'prem-proven' mindset. Silva is a marginally better version of Martinez who will crumble eventually.
Fonseca is no sure-fire choice - no manager is - but he's exciting, smart and much more worth the gamble than Silva is.
He was actually Richarlisons man Tim.
He should of a least blocked the run of Jiminez.
Win and he'll be hated? I know I don't live among RS fans (although you'd be surprised how many are coming out of the woodwork) but this RS thing is ridiculous.
Isn't it more a case that our defence has its orders of who stands where, and their forwards simply run through the weakest spot?Their main striker ghosted inbetween Richarlison and Coleman, Richarlison left him and didn't give any shout to coleman who had his back to him. So why was their #9 being marked by our left wingerand right full back and not a CB, surely that's Silva.
I'd also say in Silvas defence that communication on the field is sorely lacking in this team. There are genuinely no leaders.
At the end of the day, there's a much more deep-rooted issue at Everton than Silva.
I'm sick of the same old process. Hire a manager, play half-decent, play crap, fans turn, fire a manager, start again.
Whether Silva does go or not, I'm not really arsed now. I'm just saying, there's far more problems than him.
Isn't it more a case that our defence has its orders of who stands where, and their forwards simply run through the weakest spot?
Maybe that's the problem with our fans, and why we always struggle to get a result against them. Silva's Hull beat them 2-0, probably because Hull didn't have any other objective other than to beat them.It was half in jest, but tbh, our season is boiling down to trying to stop them win the league.
I'm gonna sound like a dumb Brexit Dad here, but i think having a manager who actually speaks good english is important. Silva is, unfortunately, another language butcher. And until someones says bleedin' Sam Allardyce, his english is worse than Koeman's. But OK.
In this moment I think you might have a point.I'm gonna sound like a dumb Brexit Dad here, but i think having a manager who actually speaks good english is important. Silva is, unfortunately, another language butcher. And until someones says bleedin' Sam Allardyce, his english is worse than Koeman's. But OK.