Billysgingham.
Player Valuation: £40m
He has to have someone lined up mate that's his job.I think Silva was sorted before brands was involved.You would like too think he's itching to volley Silva, and he (and not Moshiri) has someone lined up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He has to have someone lined up mate that's his job.I think Silva was sorted before brands was involved.You would like too think he's itching to volley Silva, and he (and not Moshiri) has someone lined up.
He has to have someone lined up mate that's his job.I think Silva was sorted before brands was involved.
McNulty hasn’t got a clue. How can he say Moyes’ spell at West Ham was a failure?
He also says VAR could be responsible for getting Silva the sack, but the decision was correct. It is his fault we simply cannot defend for, ahem, toffee.
Every one of those tits in that picture are more responsible for where we are than Silva. Absolute dereliction on their end.
Win rate is irrelevant with such a small sample size. The key objective was staying up, and he got them from 18th to 13th. It would be like Sunderland moaning about Allerdyce or Advocaat.Could be that in the 31 games Moyes was in charge at West Ham his win rate was 29% mate.
It’s actually Moshiri’s fault, as he had a strange crush on Marco after seeing him interviewed by Jim White while wearing a suit during his win streak at WatfordI get your drift but they aren't , are they ?
If you look at the vast majority of the teams above us in the league, Silva has far more available to him , than they do.
Hence , he is majorly culpable.
He has not performed , and needs to go.
If Brands doesn't remove him , then he too should be in Moshiri's firing line.
You miss the point. He never should have been appointed in the first place. He never should have seen out last season with how obvious it was he wasn't up to snuff. He should have been sacked months ago.I get your drift but they aren't , are they ?
If you look at the vast majority of the teams above us in the league, Silva has far more available to him , than they do.
Hence , he is majorly culpable.
He has not performed , and needs to go.
If Brands doesn't remove him , then he too should be in Moshiri's firing line.
Win rate is irrelevant with such a small sample size. The key objective was staying up, and he got them from 18th to 13th. It would be like Sunderland moaning about Allerdyce or Advocaat.
Nail on head.You miss the point. He never should have been appointed in the first place. He never should have seen out last season with how obvious it was he wasn't up to snuff. He should have been sacked months ago.
Ultimately he's responsible for the pitch. They are responsible for him. Him being here in the first place and still here is on them.
No mate it stems from when Silva was in charge of Olympiacos and they won at Arsenal.Moshiri fell in love thenIt’s actually Moshiri’s fault, as he had a strange crush on Marco after seeing him interviewed by Jim White while wearing a suit during his win streak at Watford
Well, Brady and Gold wanted to keep him on, but that’s still beside the point. It was as clear cut a scenario as you’ll get - a short term contract with the objective of staying up. It would be like saying Sam failed here or at Sunderland, when that is just not the case.I'm not saying he never did what he was there to do, just that the win ratio, and the fact West Ham didn't rate Moyes good enough to keep him on after the 6 month deal finished could be why McNulty looked at it as a failure.
So if that was the case of love at first sight, was Watford the equivalent of Juliet seeing Romeo loitering outside her window and quoting poetry while wearing a pair of extremely tight trousers?No mate it stems from when Silva was in charge of Olympiacos and they won at Arsenal.Moshiri fell in love then