Ok.to get a club that's under funded into that 70 points plus company is almost impossible to do
Moyes 4th with <70 points.
Martinez 5th with >70 points.
Which is best?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok.to get a club that's under funded into that 70 points plus company is almost impossible to do
absolutely.
I understand why people are against him / don't rate him, I just think there are many of us around who think he could have turned it around.
The final few months of his tenure were torture, and really the only question should have been why he wasn't removed earlier. We should remember that whilst his 1st season was undoubtedly superb, his final two saw us secure the lowest points total since Rooney's last season with us and was scarcely any better than the dark days of the late 90s. That he did that once was fine, and I suspect most supporters still backed him into his 3rd season, but to then repeat the feat and get worse and worse as the season progressed, I think enough was enough.
Lets remember, from Christmas day until his sacking, we won 5 out of 20 league games, and 1 of his last 10 league games, scoring just 7 times in the process. It was terrible. Utterly terrible.
Ok.
Moyes 4th with <70 points.
Martinez 5th with >70 points.
Which is best?
The final few months of his tenure were torture, and really the only question should have been why he wasn't removed earlier. We should remember that whilst his 1st season was undoubtedly superb, his final two saw us secure the lowest points total since Rooney's last season with us and was scarcely any better than the dark days of the late 90s. That he did that once was fine, and I suspect most supporters still backed him into his 3rd season, but to then repeat the feat and get worse and worse as the season progressed, I think enough was enough.
Lets remember, from Christmas day until his sacking, we won 5 out of 20 league games, and 1 of his last 10 league games, scoring just 7 times in the process. It was terrible. Utterly terrible.
The final few months of his tenure were torture, and really the only question should have been why he wasn't removed earlier. We should remember that whilst his 1st season was undoubtedly superb, his final two saw us secure the lowest points total since Rooney's last season with us and was scarcely any better than the dark days of the late 90s. That he did that once was fine, and I suspect most supporters still backed him into his 3rd season, but to then repeat the feat and get worse and worse as the season progressed, I think enough was enough.
Lets remember, from Christmas day until his sacking, we won 5 out of 20 league games, and 1 of his last 10 league games, scoring just 7 times in the process. It was terrible. Utterly terrible.
Absolutely agree, again. From a simply results perspective, it wasn't good enough and I fully accepted and still accept why he was dismissed.
There was far more to it than that though. He over achieved massively in that first season which is testament to him and the wonders he did with many players who found a new level.
In reality though, he managed to get the final few ounces of quality from a number of players that season and had little / no money to replace them.
Distin
Howard
Pienaar
Osman
These players were superb in the first season but fell off a cliff. In the summer before his second season, he had no idea that these 4 had lost the ability to get on a football pitch / play the game and thus chucked his entire kitty at bringing Lukaku into the club.
He made some bad buys of course and the whole set piece debacle was infuriating. All in all though, I do wonder how Koeman would have done coming into what Martinez did AND maintaining it without the ability to throw millions at the squad.
How did he?
We'd finished 6th the season prior under Moyes with 63 points and he had the luxury of adding a striker (albeit on loan) who was the £20m+ finisher that Moyes could only dream of.
Absolutely agree, again. From a simply results perspective, it wasn't good enough and I fully accepted and still accept why he was dismissed.
There was far more to it than that though. He over achieved massively in that first season which is testament to him and the wonders he did with many players who found a new level.
In reality though, he managed to get the final few ounces of quality from a number of players that season and had little / no money to replace them.
Distin
Howard
Pienaar
Osman
These players were superb in the first season but fell off a cliff. In the summer before his second season, he had no idea that these 4 had lost the ability to get on a football pitch / play the game and thus chucked his entire kitty at bringing Lukaku into the club.
He made some bad buys of course and the whole set piece debacle was infuriating. All in all though, I do wonder how Koeman would have done coming into what Martinez did AND maintaining it without the ability to throw millions at the squad.
Yes he did well for getting 5th but don't forget that was a team which got 63 points and 6th in the previous season.
Martinez had more resources than Moyes and now Koeman has more resources than Martinez. Think we moved on at time.
Moyes's net spend was around £1.5m per season. Martinez was about £16m per season. Enough said.
With respect, it wasn't a simple like for like transition.
We played a completely different way, having Everton on the ball and playing confidently rather under Moyes which a more direct brand of football until the final third.
He changed everything about us, top to bottom, without spending any sort of serious cash.
Your argument is one I never understand. Whilst it is absolutely reasonable to suggest that Martinez ultimately failed to deliver - regardless of any context / mitigating circumstances - it cannot be denied in my opinion that he did a wonderful job in that first season.
Utd away, Arsenal away, Arsenal at home, Newcastle at home.... unbelievable performances which were absolutely no reflection of Moyes' team the season before.
Criticise where fair, absolutely. Credit where credit is due is also important.
For that first season? You sure?
With respect, it wasn't a simple like for like transition.
We played a completely different way, having Everton on the ball and playing confidently rather under Moyes which a more direct brand of football until the final third.
He changed everything about us, top to bottom, without spending any sort of serious cash.
Your argument is one I never understand. Whilst it is absolutely reasonable to suggest that Martinez ultimately failed to deliver - regardless of any context / mitigating circumstances - it cannot be denied in my opinion that he did a wonderful job in that first season.
Utd away, Arsenal away, Arsenal at home, Newcastle at home.... unbelievable performances which were absolutely no reflection of Moyes' team the season before.
Criticise where fair, absolutely. Credit where credit is due is also important.