Transfer Rumour Michy Batshuayi

[Bluewolf]

....Sky saying Batshuayi wants a loan move to Spurs but Chelsea are reluctant to do business with a rival. Regardless, we’re not mentioned.

Good enough for spurs but not for us lol

 

[blue to the bone]

Good enough for spurs but not for us lol

Spurs may want to loan him because kane is out. Short term thinking.
We don't want him cos Chelsea want too much money.
It's not too hard to figure out.

 

[Eggs]

Good enough for spurs but not for us lol

....I reckon we were keen but not at the deal being offered. A loan was the way to go as it mitigated the risk, but obviously we couldn’t go down that route.

 

[Azzurri]

Good enough for spurs but not for us lol

Who says he’s good enough for Spurs, though? Maybe he isn’t.

 

[longers]

From Sky:

Chelsea are trying to find a club who will take Batshuayi on loan, but they are having a few problems with his wage demands.

Weird statement. What wage demands ? If he's on loan then he won't be making any demands as his wages are already set in stone from the contract he has with Chelsea... no one renegotiates their wages every time they join a club on loan do they ? the only negotiation is between the clubs as to what percentage the loaning club will contribute. He gets his full £160k a week or whatever it is regardless of whether he stays at Chelsea or goes on loan.

 

[Leeboy1974]

no one in as expected. Loaning out couple of already on loan players. No complaint at all. Hopefully we can continue to move on the deadwood between now and August.

With results some of the deadwood is on the pitch

 

[billyblue80]

Why hasn't he gone somewhere there isn't a late twist is there?

 

[Eggs]

Weird statement. What wage demands ? If he's on loan then he won't be making any demands as his wages are already set in stone from the contract he has with Chelsea... no one renegotiates their wages every time they join a club on loan do they ? the only negotiation is between the clubs as to what percentage the loaning club will contribute. He gets his full £160k a week or whatever it is regardless of whether he stays at Chelsea or goes on loan.

.....I don’t think he’s on £160k per week at Chelsea, I think that’s what he wants if he moves. If he stays, he remains on £120k per week. Poor lad.

 

[Frang]

Weird statement. What wage demands ? If he's on loan then he won't be making any demands as his wages are already set in stone from the contract he has with Chelsea... no one renegotiates their wages every time they join a club on loan do they ? the only negotiation is between the clubs as to what percentage the loaning club will contribute. He gets his full £160k a week or whatever it is regardless of whether he stays at Chelsea or goes on loan.

Yes I always thought the parent club pay the majority if not All of their players wagers..

Thats why we are struggling with all these players out on loan. We still pay them

 

[mawders]

160k a week, he is not worth

 

[marnie]

We ‘swerved’ him hours, nay days, ago you utter psychopaths.

We didn't even swerve him.We didn't even buy a Big Issue off him.

 

[everton1953]

Not coming here thank the Lord.

 

[Frang]

Not coming here thank the Lord.

Would of been another one sucking a huge wage out the club for sod all return for 3 years

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

.....I don’t think he’s on £160k per week at Chelsea, I think that’s what he wants if he moves. If he stays, he remains on £120k per week. Poor lad.

When I checked it had him down as being on £70k at Chelsea mate.

 

[Goat]

Good enough for spurs but not for us lol

He wont be joining Spurs.