Oh look I was right ?A speculative one as had been told something but don’t know if it meant he was training or just going in for treatment at club
Cutbacks, gormless facial expressions, arms flailing, feigning interest in a progressive attacking move in favour of hitting it back to the goalkeeper, crosses under no pressure that sail over the crossbar. The list goes on.Please hurry back I can't take seeing Coleman and his cutbacks.
November arrives and we get a "we've decided to play it safe and introduce him back after the World Cup".'2-3 weeks away'
Crikey that sounds like it could be as early as mid-Novembersome recovery that.
Just in time for the World Cup break'2-3 weeks away'
Crikey that sounds like it could be as early as mid-Novembersome recovery that.
The averages over the games Patterson played v ColemanCutbacks, gormless facial expressions, arms flailing, feigning interest in a progressive attacking move in favour of hitting it back to the goalkeeper, crosses under no pressure that sail over the crossbar. The list goes on.
Still playing four years longer than he should be, but it's not his fault I guess.The averages over the games Patterson played v Coleman
Coleman is Higher on Crosses attempted
Higher successful crosses
Higher Pass success rate final third
Higher Pass success rate opponents half
Higher chances created
Higher Big chances created
Patterson is Higher on tackles
Higher on recoveries
I'm not saying Coleman should be first choice(because it's weirdly all black & white round here on this issue) but I am saying that if you have a point to make to support some agenda, at least get the facts right
I am shocked, shocked to my very core, that someone with a leprechaun avatar is defending Coleman.The averages over the games Patterson played v Coleman
Coleman is Higher on Crosses attempted
Higher successful crosses
Higher Pass success rate final third
Higher Pass success rate opponents half
Higher chances created
Higher Big chances created
Patterson is Higher on tackles
Higher on recoveries
I'm not saying Coleman should be first choice(because it's weirdly all black & white round here on this issue) but I am saying that if you have a point to make to support some agenda, at least get the facts right