Yes, they’ve had five managers since taking over Roma. But let’s not confuse adaptability with incompetence. Football is not static, and circumstances often force changes. Friedkin didn’t inherit a perfect setup at Roma—they came into a club with structural issues and a fanbase demanding immediate results. Each managerial change reflected their willingness to course-correct and find the best fit for their vision. That’s not a failure; that’s pragmatism.
Take Mourinho as an example. He wasn’t just a random name—they identified someone who could deliver stability and trophies. And guess what? He delivered Roma’s first European trophy in decades. Not every manager works out long-term, but the fact that Friedkin keeps trying until they get it right is a sign of ambition, not failure. You might laugh at five managers, but I’d rather see that than an owner who sticks with a bad choice out of stubbornness or lack of vision.
Here’s the thing: spotting a good manager doesn’t mean they’ll stay forever. Football isn’t a one-size-fits-all sport. A manager who works for one phase of a project might not work for the next, and Friedkin has shown they’re not afraid to make those tough calls. That’s what good leadership looks like—adapting to the needs of the club, not clinging to outdated plans.
At Everton, where poor decisions have dragged us into this mess, we need owners who will take bold steps to fix things. Five managers at Roma might sound like a lot, but wouldn’t you rather have owners who are willing to learn and improve, instead of doubling down on bad decisions? If anything, their track record shows they’ll do what it takes to get it right—and that’s exactly what we need right now.