New Everton Stadium

[a bell maul]

This has probably already been discussed, but what are they planning to do about the smell? We drove past again after the match, and it stinks !

are there any health issues with building anything close to a sewerage treatment facility?

 

[Eggs]

are there any health issues with building anything close to a sewerage treatment facility?

...it's much healthier than being close to Anfield.

 

[a bell maul]

...it's much healthier than being close to Anfield.

for the soul, yes, but what about the immune system?

 

[Eggs]

for the soul, yes, but what about the immune system?

..I'm sure it's fine, plenty of businesses down there.

 

[Nobby Nobbs]

Of course the real difference is that back then we had a director and shareholder who donated the cash to build the stadium

No the difference is we have to deal with a company like peel,. Find 300m, deal with world heritage people and a myriad of problems that just wasn't there when we built Goodison,. And quite frankly to compare the two is just ridiculous.

 

[nsno-chris]

Of course the real difference is that back then we had a director and shareholder who donated the cash to build the stadium.

Thank you James Clement Baxter, you were a shining example to future owners of the club....it's just a pity they didn't foillow your example and instead are tring to saddle us with 40 years worth of financial insecurity to build a new home.

Back then you could also build the stadium with child labour.

 

[big bobs beard]

This has probably already been discussed, but what are they planning to do about the smell? We drove past again after the match, and it stinks !

The Airwick Arena it is then

 

[Amw79]

Back then you could also build the stadium with child labour.

I want a return to 19th century business models and construction methods else this whole endeavour is a sham.

 

[roydo]

Back then you could also build the stadium with child labour.

Quatar still do.

 

[davek]

No the difference is we have to deal with a company like peel,. Find 300m, deal with world heritage people and a myriad of problems that just wasn't there when we built Goodison,. And quite frankly to compare the two is just ridiculous.

No it's not. Now the go ahead is given it's all about finances and what owners are prepared to personally risk. The £2,000 put forward in 1892 from someone like Baxter - who was a doctor and who's family owned theatres in Liverpool - would have been a massive amount of his wealth that he was prepared to risk in order to get the move done while handing the club a clean bill of financial health without fear of debt, because he demanded no repayment. Moshiri is risking nothing. Not one penny.

 

[The Rhino]

No it's not. Now the go ahead is given it's all about finances and what owners are prepared to personally risk. The £2,000 put forward in 1892 from someone like Baxter - who was a doctor and who's family owned theatres in Liverpool - would have been a massive amount of his wealth that he was prepared to risk in order to get the move done while handing the club a clean bill of financial health without fear of debt, because he demanded no repayment. Moshiri is risking nothing. Not one penny.

Baxter would have an emotional tie Moshiri doesn't.

Who cares if it makes him money if it gets us a City takeover down the line whilst giving us a shiny modern ground in a prime area of future investment?

 

[Bazlar]

...it's much healthier than being close to Anfield.

...smells less too

 

[roydo]

Moshiri is risking nothing. Not one penny.

1. You dont know that. No one does. The finance isnt even arranged.

2. And anyrate, so what? His risk is low = Evertons is. IPSO Facto of being the major shareholder.

 

[nsno-chris]

Quatar still do.

*Qatar

 

[roydo]

*Qatar

Soz mate.