Toffeelover
Player Valuation: £80m
T
The Everton sign MUST face the dock to help our Russian overlords oarj there USM yacht
Have an Everton sign on all four sides.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
T
The Everton sign MUST face the dock to help our Russian overlords oarj there USM yacht
Did you get to more games now you live up north ?Don’t worry. Most on here don’t go.
Have an Everton sign on all four sides.
FWIW my position on "iconic" has changed over the lifetime of this scheme. I did think that it could only be described as such if it had a unique frontage/roof/materials etc....which would be nice too. However, I've gradually accepted they might well be out of the reach of a club looking to get financing for this stadium and that in those circumstances we have to accept the fact that "iconic" relates to the location - on a globally recognisable waterfront and part of a world heritage site. It would be hard pressed not to be impressive on that site. And make no mistake about it, the Kopites will be spitting blood at the sight of our ground being projected like that.
That all being said, and due to funding and the record of this club ballsing up anything worth doing, I still rate the chances of this happening at no better than about 20%.
I am happy it looks to be moving on but, having told all my mates (non-blues) about Meis saying he was going to make "the best club ground in the world"I am a bit underwhelmed.. Purely on external aesthetics, it is bog standard, especially when compared to the new CHelsea and Spurs grounds.
I wanted thiese types:
View attachment 54417
View attachment 54418
View attachment 54419
Spot the mistakes in this post.
Good point, but I can imagine the majority of the main stand concourse will be for premium hospitality.
Let’s wait and see, I really wanted a spurs like concourse where it’s essentially massive with plenty of options but that was never going to happen.
Regeneration and profits were always motivations at the back of all our failed stadium schemes.I kind of agree with your pessimism, but I think there are too many driving factors such as spearheading the regeneration of the area - economic benefits it will provide to the city - but let’s be realistic, it’s the investors who are looking to make a fortune off the surrounding area including our current owners.
That’s why I think it will happen. Rich people get richer from the project who are in control, but we get a new stadium from it.
The fact it’s on the river front is going to guarantee it will look iconic.
Did you get to more games now you live up north ?
I wouldn't believe what anyone at that club says.It is way higher than 20%. They've already indicated they can get the 350m from the banks. Perhaps because the difference between what the council said they could do (275m) they are waiting to see if Joe can wing it to up their offer of funding to spare commercial rates. There is also obvious fat that can still be cut, the car park, the TV screens, a couple more thousand seats. I bet Moshiri is also good for another 50-75 million if the worst comes to the worst.
What this hinges on is a fixed price build. I doubt any UK firms will risk that but a Russian company might, especially if other building projects that are more straightforward can be tagged on to the contract to share the load.