Bill says the none existant safety certificate is good for however long you want it to be... allegedly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not a chance I’d guess
Historic England hate us apparently
Frenk
Player Valuation: £35m
Or RS fans have suddenly become heritage site protectors with their complaints.
surely not, they wouldn't be that self interested and blinkered. Oh hang on...
Yes plaster was up significantly, but I was reading a publication from G&T yesterday who expect construction contracts to be 1-1.5% cheaper to the end of 21 and then back to pre-Covid levels in 22 before a1% increase in 23.
barneygumble
Player Valuation: £60m
Everton's revised stadium plans face Historic England criticism - BBC News
Historic England says the club's plans for a 52,000-seat stadium could harm Grade II-listed structures.
www.google.com
allowed a sewage treatment plant, some eyesores on the waterfrontyet they’d be sound leaving an area in disrepair? Yeah, okay? Lol
chazzle_dazzle
Player Valuation: £35m
Everton's revised stadium plans face Historic England criticism - BBC News
Historic England says the club's plans for a 52,000-seat stadium could harm Grade II-listed structures.
allowed a sewage treatment plant, some eyesores on the waterfrontyet they’d be sound leaving an area in disrepair? Yeah, okay? Lol
Talking utter bile those lot... area in complete disrepair and they don't want regeneration, they'd be happy for no progress ever.
Minor bump in the road, Gov wants these projects moving, I don't think it'll even be a blip in their mind.
Read the Historic Britain statement and it would appear that their major objection is to the dock being filled in.
Surely they should have made it clear from the start that they would ask for any non-aquatic based development to be called in which would have given us the time to build a large stadium sized boat, reposition protected buildings, knock down seaward wall and reinstate to original.
Love the bit where they allude to residential developments having been approved - houseboats perhaps?
Surely they should have made it clear from the start that they would ask for any non-aquatic based development to be called in which would have given us the time to build a large stadium sized boat, reposition protected buildings, knock down seaward wall and reinstate to original.
Love the bit where they allude to residential developments having been approved - houseboats perhaps?
there’s a filled in dock not half a mile away from BMD. They just want to be noticed and sound relevant
or could be sabre rattling on the hope that they get a bit of sway on future projects on the docks, knowing that this one will get passed largely unchanged
Joeharper07
Player Valuation: £750k
Out of interest where is that mate
