Post-planning permission, is it too much to be informed as to how this will actually be funded, with detail rather than ambiguity?
Having looked at Goat’s post in the transfer thread, showing how we’ve gone from Carlo Ancellotti laughing about FFP and being linked to Koulibally to supposedly being skint in a matter of months. Then I can’t help but think that the queue of people wanting to lend money for this stadium venture may not be very big at all, and that Moshiri or USM may have to use more of their own funds then first thought?
Just a hypothesis based on the limited information available.
In the commercial property world, our ground is a mere pin prick, finance wise. To lenders, (if we have them), the risk is different than say funding a shopping centre. As in, the sole occupant is a football club, not dozens of shops. So, if said club goes pop, you cant really get a new club playing there, and you cant really use it for anything else.
So, as a lender, (if we have one), you do have some leverage re interest rates, cos the risk is higher. But, as the borrower, (if we do), you can mitigate that by owners of means providing guarantees of repayment.
So, a guaranteed repayment, and a guaranteed yield, (interest payments), turns out to be very very low risk, and very attractive, in the commercial property funding world. Which are often pension funds and shiz.