Toffeeslam
Player Valuation: £35m
And they will continue using it until the ground receives a name.
naming rights I bet
let’s hope it’s not something silly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And they will continue using it until the ground receives a name.
Am I right in thinking the club made many alterations in an attempt to hold on the world heritage status? Such as the height of the stadium.
Wonder if we could scrap these and go back to original.
No. The site might be called that by some for now, but the stadium is a different matter. There'll be no more imprecision over that. You're not factoring in recent developments or the obvious fact that selling naming rights isn't helped by the club in the prior period adopting that name for it.And they will continue using it until the ground receives a name.
Was the capacity/overall size a factor for UNESCO? Original 60k capacity looked so much better!
Don’t like to moan too much tho….love the design of stadium still
Was the capacity/overall size a factor for UNESCO? Original 60k capacity looked so much better!
Don’t like to moan too much tho….love the design of stadium still
The original 60k stadium was basically for if we had been awarded the commonwealth games (although it would only hold approx 40k for athletics). This was in an east-west configuration.
There was a diagram posted in this thread a while ago which did indeed suggest that orientation change. I’ll see if I can find it…Have you got any documentation to back up the east to west layout on the site for the games?
The image I saw was broadly similar to what we have now but the South stand was open and part of the track was on a raised platform above Nelson Dock.
It was posted a few pages ago..... it is impossible to fit an athletics track in the north-south without the stadium going into the neighbouring dock....Have you got any documentation to back up the east to west layout on the site for the games?
The image I saw was broadly similar to what we have now but the South stand was open and part of the track was on a raised platform above Nelson Dock.
Could find the post @The binman chronicles - but I found the image elsewhere:
View attachment 142754
I’m assuming the image is in the standard north-south orientation, anyway, it looks that way. So that would make the stadium East-West.
Maybe, but it seems like a good way for the owners to start ijvesting in the entire dockland regeneration project
I think it's more likely we go back to spending like mad after its built
No. The site might be called that by some for now, but the stadium is a different matter. There'll be no more imprecision over that. You're not factoring in recent developments or the obvious fact that selling naming rights isn't helped by the club in the prior period adopting that name for it.