kimonthemac_efc
Player Valuation: £950k
Released earlier. What do you think?
kimonthemac_efc
Player Valuation: £950k
Listen to VAR audio that caused Forest penalty controversy ð | Match Officials Mic'd Up
SUBSCRIBE ⺠https://bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsPLPREMIER LEAGUE HIGHLIGHTS ⺠https://bit.ly/SkyPLHighlights2324GET NEXT SEASON'S PREMIER LEAGUE SHIRTS HERE ⺠h...
www.google.com
BullensRoad
Player Valuation: £20m
They’re being a bit pathetic banging on about it.
Who cares
Laffin ere lad 
Pittsburgh Footy
Player Valuation: £35m
I honestly could not care less.
None of the penalty shouts were "clear and obvious".
None of the penalty shouts were "clear and obvious".
all these shouts are subjective, we could roll out people with the opposite viewpoint and make equally valid points supporting their view. That is how it should work for me, infield ref sees it, says what he thinks and VAR should check for something grossly different to what the onfield ref has seen and act accordingly. There is no reason why this live feed of their radio comms cant be broadcast live in a separate red button type feed, openness, transparency, and it will explain the ref's thought processes. Many tackling fouls are gut feeling decisions, rather than a definition driven decisions
Down with VAR, and this sort of thing
Careful now
Careful now
I certainly do not.
For me they were 3 penos, I didnt study them like, but I would have been peed off if we didnt get 3 penos there.
But we won, so I dont care.
kenada_blue
Welcome to Barcelonaton FC
Arsed
Although "release the audio" shouts are always funny.
What's it gonna tell you? Nothing. What's it gonna change? Nothing.
Although "release the audio" shouts are always funny.
What's it gonna tell you? Nothing. What's it gonna change? Nothing.
Would have been better if VAR had just called them scabs
"Ooh, go on Ash, lad"
