• Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ONE RULE FOR THEM. ANOTHER FOR EVERYONE ELSE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didnt Southampton try and pull this of a few seasons back, the investment vehicle for the owners was declard bank rupt and the club tired to argue that it had nothing to do with the club it was the company.

From what i remember they were still hit with a deduction.

Yes but apparently the Kopites have "arranged" that they won't be. Even though its an identical position.
 

Southampton have been effectively relegated after being docked 10 points by the Football League.

The ruling comes after Saints' parent company went into administration, though the club and administrators say they expect to launch an appeal.

Four points off safety with two games to go, Saints will lose 10 points if they stay up in the Championship.

And if they do not avoid finishing in the bottom three then the points penalty will take effect next season.
The south coast outfit had hoped to avoid the punishment as they argued that it was their parent company Southampton Leisure Holdings plc (SLH) which had gone into administration on 2 April - not the football club.
o.gif


But a League investigation by "independent forensic accountants" found that the football club and SLH were "inextricably linked as one economic entity" and applied their mandatory penalty.

The League also found that: "The holding company has no income of its own; all revenue and expenditure is derived from the operation of Southampton Football Club and the associated stadium company.

"The holding company is solvent in its own right. It only becomes insolvent when account is taken of the position of Southampton football club and the other group companies."

The statement added that there was no alternative other than to invoke the 10-point penalty.

It was also revealed that the company commissioned to look into the matter reported that co-operation with them was withdrawn towards the end of their enquiries.

However, Mark Fry, joint administrator of SLH, insisted he was "shocked and extremely disappointed" with the League's decision to deduct points.
 


Can readily believe LFC would find a way out of this, it positively stinks. Not the first time rules have been changed for them, remember when they finished 5th!!1
 
The only plausible explanation that I can see for the decision is that by placing the holding company in administration, they can then sell that company's only asset (the club ) without having to defer to the Americans. I suppose in that light you can see the distinction between the holding company going into administration (in which case the club will be sold, which is what RBS need to make happen to get their money back) and the club going in (in which case players, etc. would be sold).

Still furious, mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top