Is he guilty or not lads?
A simple yes or no will do
Hit me up
He's as guilty as sin mate.
However, whether he's convicted is another matter...
The latest twist is that right at the end of the defence evidence, they wheeled out a supposed medical expert who said he suffered from an anxiety condition that meant he was liable to attack rather than run when confronted.
This is a total change in his defence, which all along has maintained that he shot on impulse and didn't knowingly shoot at an intruder - it was an 'accident'
As even if cleared of murder, he'd likely be culpable of the lesser charge of shooting to kill without ample provocation, which could land him 15 years.
The prosecution took issue and said that if the defence were claiming he had mental issues then that need to corroborated by him going for a 30 day assessment. This is an iffy strategy as if it comes back that he is mentally challenged, then he'll likely be deemed unfit to stand full stop. However, if it comes back he's fine, the credibility of the entire defence lies in total tatters
