Oumar Niasse

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gwladysstreetlad said:
I'm getting a little tired of the poor old Niasse rubbish I'm seeing on here. Yes it wasn't his fault that the fraud brought him here but he's being extremely well paid for nothing. You could say that's all the more reason for Koeman to play him but I don't believe that. Sorry people but if our manager says Niasse isn't good enough to even get on our subs bench I believe him. I don't need much convincing after what I've seen from the lad! It's getting very boring seeing people whine over the fact that he doesn't have a locker, get over it! If anyone on here went to work and did it as badly as Niasse we'd be sacked on the spot. Niasse on the other hand continues to collect his colossal wages every week. If I was paid the same wages as him and the only cross I had to bear was I was made to train with the under 23's and not given a locker I'd be laughing all the way to the bank! so spare me the sob story of the poor multi millionaire footballer because it doesn't wash as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...
So to clarify, what you're saying is, that because he earns a good wage that negates any need for gentlemanly respect and overall good conduct?

I'm not saying he should have been given an opportunity to play and I'm glad he'll be plying his trade somewhere else, but for me denying him a locker says more about the club than him.

And with regards to doing their job - football is purely subjective. You buy someone, offer them a contract and it's all on opinion. It's not like a regular job with specific KPIs to fulfil is it.
 

PhilM said:
So to clarify, what you're saying is, that because he earns a good wage that negates any need for gentlemanly respect and overall good conduct?

I'm not saying he should have been given an opportunity to play and I'm glad he'll be plying his trade somewhere else, but for me denying him a locker says more about the club than him.

And with regards to doing their job - football is purely subjective. You buy someone, offer them a contract and it's all on opinion. It's not like a regular job with specific KPIs to fulfil is it.
Click to expand...
I'm saying if the manager decides he doesn't deserve a locker then he doesn't deserve a locker. Gentlemanly conduct can get to hell this is a business not a charity. Yes there was once a time when football was more then a business but sadly those days are long behind us, most players are mercenaries and have no loyalty to us at all.
 
Gwladysstreetlad said:
I'm saying if the manager decides he doesn't deserve a locker then he doesn't deserve a locker. Gentlemanly conduct can get to hell this is a business not a charity. Yes there was once a time when football was more then a business but sadly those days are long behind us, most players are mercenaries and have no loyalty to us at all.
Click to expand...
Therefore if your boss decided tomorrow he didn't like you anymore, that he thought that your face didn't fit in anymore...

... or that you couldn't cut the mustard, you'd accept that if he removed you from the canteen? Or took your locker?

It would be purely business wouldn't it so of course that would be entirely fair and reasonable to do so; your logic of course.
 

PhilM said:
Therefore if your boss decided tomorrow he didn't like you anymore, that he thought that your face didn't fit in anymore...

... or that you couldn't cut the mustard, you'd accept that if he removed you from the canteen? Or took your locker?

It would be purely business wouldn't it so of course that would be entirely fair and reasonable to do so; your logic of course.
Click to expand...

Still get paid and not have to work?

Go ed then
 
PhilM said:
So to clarify, what you're saying is, that because he earns a good wage that negates any need for gentlemanly respect and overall good conduct?

I'm not saying he should have been given an opportunity to play and I'm glad he'll be plying his trade somewhere else, but for me denying him a locker says more about the club than him.

And with regards to doing their job - football is purely subjective. You buy someone, offer them a contract and it's all on opinion. It's not like a regular job with specific KPIs to fulfil is it.
Click to expand...
I don't get the locker thing it's a bit petty, he could have made more of it for the article (that's what I think probably happened) he probably has a locker but not with the first team I don't know. But if the club didn't give him one to degrade him that very childish (it's one of them stupid things that has been blown out of all proportions. He wasn't hardly played by the manager that bought him, I don't think Koeman was ever going to play him however he performed for the U23's so I wish him well and if he had definitely gone or going to Hull I hope he helps keep them up.
 
PhilM said:
Therefore if your boss decided tomorrow he didn't like you anymore, that he thought that your face didn't fit in anymore...

... or that you couldn't cut the mustard, you'd accept that if he removed you from the canteen? Or took your locker?

It would be purely business wouldn't it so of course that would be entirely fair and reasonable to do so; your logic of course.
Click to expand...
Except he hasn't sent him away from Goodison or the club he's sent him away from the first team because he doesn't consider him good enough, all very right and proper for the world of football. Should we also allow all the youth players to be with the first team to so to be fair? The real life analogy's don't work with football and it was my fault for even comparing them in the first place but you know as well as I do that that the situations aren't comparable but yes if I was being paid his level of pay I'd be fine with it.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top