Under The Lights
ORDER NOW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You're a plank and your opinion is invalid.
Think you will find its the other way round mate.
Any idea who it was?
Why do we never like the same people? Why oh why?
Actually deathbyropeandglass, I'll make this even easier for you.
Did Neville only lose possession in the game three times?
Ta.
I've only just seen this so :
I never said he did only give the ball away 3 times. You said he gave it away constantly/consistently, then when evidence was provided to show that he didn't you backtracked to saying he did when he had to play an actual pass of note, that being actually offensive actual passes that could come to something rather than simple 5 yard passes.
That graph above is for his "forward" passes so i'm assuming it doesn't cover backwards passes. And in those forweard passes, which are ones likely to be classed as passes of note he gave it away 3 times in total, 1 time out of 4 whilst playing decent offensive passes likely to come to something.
So using my eyes and watching the game, and then using stats from the game, yes i know they're not perfect but they support my argument not yours so surely it means there's more chance of mine being the correct one : that Neville simply did not "give the ball away constantly/consistently" in the derby.
And you were talking rubbish. On that one issue, not arguing about anything else you said about Neville, just if you're gonna criticise him at least be right.
Haha really Tubey? Really?
Oh no hang on you have me on ignore so i guess you won't read this. I'll say this anyway just so everyone else can laugh at your incredibley girly reaction.
I'm not gonna ignore you, i quite like you. I (and plenty of others) think you were talking rubbish when you said "Neville gave the ball away constantly", and your attempts at justifying it were laughable really, but no harm done really.
And the neg rep was for you derailing the discussion about Pienaar to get in a dig at LCAB. Thats the LCAB i really couldn't give 2 ****s about but from your little bitchy revenge rep think i do, the same guy you've bitched about since he left here and said bad things about the site. I thought it was pathetic so negged you , no big deal really is it?
As for only replying to this cause i'm biased? That sounds like kopite conspiracy talk to me if ever i've heard it.
To be honest i might have been a bit aggressive with disagreeing with you, but i thought you'd be one of the few people on here who were man enough to take it. Maybe not. Or its some kind of joke thats going over my head. Good job i didn't post my thoughts on Pienaar being a mercenary earlier, you'd probably have a hit out on me by now.