Pylon proximity subsidy

[Blue 1]

No.

Eat the rich.

FTFY.

 

[NeilMorepies]

They are illegal and built by the radical far-left to stop the word of Jesus being beamed into good people’s heads. We definitely won’t be paying for them. I will force the Electricians from Electricia to pay for them if they want them so bad.

 

[Sarnia Kevin]

The lecky board should pay this, there are potential health issues. However that should come from their shareholder profits, and not be an extra on others' bills. That would be complicated.

Perhaps the best answer would be a reduction in council tax, given by any council stupid enough to grant planning permission for the houses.

The shareholder is "Mad Ed" Milliband, and he surely won't be putting his hand in his own pocket any time soon.

 

[Yarrgh]

Thread title is a good name for a band

Great debut album, saw them in '72 supporting Van der Graaf Generator. Louis Patchouli had one of the greatest singing voice in the history of rock and roll.

 

[degsy]

Fair point ... surely the pylons need permission too?

Not under Labour's NIMBYless deregulated rules??

 

[Jimishorts]

Only if we get the frankly terrifying videos about them back...

The 80's were a simpler time.