bluebastardo
Player Valuation: £40m
I watched some highlights tonight of the English clubs playing in the Champions League, and continued to watch a few other fixtures.
I watched the Arsenal match, and couldn't help thinking that the ref just wasn't up to the task, in the way he handled each situation.
An absolute blatant penalty for Arsenal denied, closely followed by a rediculous 2 minutes involving a back pass, a dodgy free kick, and a goal for Porto.
There are a few points that come into this scenario that can be divided by opinion, but the main case for Arsenal is that the referee has become an active part of play, and almost reinvented himself as a 12th Porto player.
Arsenal have the ball in hand, and the refereee walks over, takes the ball, places it in the hands of the Porto player rather promptly, and while the refereee is interfering with play by not leaving the immidiate area, the Porto player takes the kick quickly, passing it a few feet, and Porto put the ball in the net.
The goal stands much to the bewilderment of Arsenal.
In another game, the Bayern Munich player is yards offside, but is allowed to join the play and score.
Earlier in the same game, the ref disallows a goal, and instead, awards a penalty.
Now refs can always try and justify their performances, often refering to the rule book during the process for a life line, but are these same refs really up to the job for these important matches?
Apparently 32 countries are submitting referees to the World cup, with Mexico and New Zealand providing 2.
How these referees are chosen is beyond comprehension in the eyes of many, and some expect a refereeing fiasco to take place in Africa.
Is there an agenda against English teams?
Is it just that refs are below standard?
I'm sure there are more examples in which to highlight inefficiencies, but it's a dodgy situation at best.
Picture England v Spain in the final, be it in the European or World cup final.
The score lies at 2-2, and England score with 30 seconds of normal time remaining. The referee blows for a foul in the box, and disallows the goal.
Defoe steps up and misses.
England lose on penalties minutes later.
It doesn't even need to be England. The point is it's a situation that could be abused.
Any thoughts?
Sorry for the long post.
I watched the Arsenal match, and couldn't help thinking that the ref just wasn't up to the task, in the way he handled each situation.
An absolute blatant penalty for Arsenal denied, closely followed by a rediculous 2 minutes involving a back pass, a dodgy free kick, and a goal for Porto.
There are a few points that come into this scenario that can be divided by opinion, but the main case for Arsenal is that the referee has become an active part of play, and almost reinvented himself as a 12th Porto player.
Arsenal have the ball in hand, and the refereee walks over, takes the ball, places it in the hands of the Porto player rather promptly, and while the refereee is interfering with play by not leaving the immidiate area, the Porto player takes the kick quickly, passing it a few feet, and Porto put the ball in the net.
The goal stands much to the bewilderment of Arsenal.
In another game, the Bayern Munich player is yards offside, but is allowed to join the play and score.
Earlier in the same game, the ref disallows a goal, and instead, awards a penalty.
Now refs can always try and justify their performances, often refering to the rule book during the process for a life line, but are these same refs really up to the job for these important matches?
Apparently 32 countries are submitting referees to the World cup, with Mexico and New Zealand providing 2.
How these referees are chosen is beyond comprehension in the eyes of many, and some expect a refereeing fiasco to take place in Africa.
Is there an agenda against English teams?
Is it just that refs are below standard?
I'm sure there are more examples in which to highlight inefficiencies, but it's a dodgy situation at best.
Picture England v Spain in the final, be it in the European or World cup final.
The score lies at 2-2, and England score with 30 seconds of normal time remaining. The referee blows for a foul in the box, and disallows the goal.
Defoe steps up and misses.
England lose on penalties minutes later.
It doesn't even need to be England. The point is it's a situation that could be abused.
Any thoughts?
Sorry for the long post.