gotta beat keep the GF down against them lot and then try be brentford
gotta beat keep the GF down against them lot and then try be brentford
Blue Willy
Player Valuation: £6m
Exactly that, again, a point at least v Brentford because if we take nothing from that game and assuming TRS beat us, Luton can go above us if they beat Wolves and then us on their turf. Big ifs, but…. Everton. Can easily swing around in a week.
lieneverton
Player Valuation: £8m
Not counting chickens yet. Not expecting anything Wedmesday and we have minimal rest until a Brentford team who will be mega confident. Then on to a horrible away game.
I think we'll be OK, ridiculously massive eib today, but no room for complacency.
I think we'll be OK, ridiculously massive eib today, but no room for complacency.
Bazlar
Player Valuation: £20m
One more win should do it
uglykidjoe1982
Player Valuation: £500k
In broad terms, I agree. The spanner in the works is we have to play Luton
Wow, this is mental.
www.dailymail.co.uk
MARK CLATTENBURG: Referee's hat-trick of howlers is mind-boggling
EXCLUSIVE BY MARK CLATTENBURG: One of these errors would have been bad enough. Three was a joke, and that is why Nottingham Forest were left feeling victimised after another defeat.
PhilEFC
Player Valuation: £35m
He’s got some nerve, the corrupt helmet.Wow, this is mental.
MARK CLATTENBURG: Referee's hat-trick of howlers is mind-boggling
EXCLUSIVE BY MARK CLATTENBURG: One of these errors would have been bad enough. Three was a joke, and that is why Nottingham Forest were left feeling victimised after another defeat.
kithnou
Player Valuation: £70m
What’s your choice of drink tonight Matty?
Lee Smith
Player Valuation: £35m
Jagielka absolutely smashed his match analysis on MOTD with the penalty shout discussions. Even Murphy was decent (swallows the sick in my mouth). Both said exactly what I said earlier. First one would have been soft, handball wasn’t a pen, third was nailed on pen.
got to have a good enough gap on them
if the innovative is they can go above us if we lose
So former ref, employed by a club, writes in national media, to put pressure on future decision making. Hes not doing anything like this if he wasn’t paid by Nottingham Forest. So he’s a paid club employee trying to influence future decision making. It’s not right.
Secondly I think these allegations are very serious, the allegation is intentional cheating, direct from club to the PGMOL/PL, now a paid club employee via the national media, in a role he’s presenting himself as a professional “referee expert” or judge. Whats the purpose of this role apart from applyimg pressure or duress on decision making - like we are seeing.
Yep can't really argue with what they said. The last penalty shout is by far the their best shout.
We were clearly fortunate not to give away a penalty. But I'm not having this talk about 3 penalties for those incidents.
Industrial bleachWhat’s your choice of drink tonight Matty?
