Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Richarlison at Spurs

GoldenToffee said:
30 at the end of the season is Kane. Plenty of injuries in the past and nearing the end of or already past his peak. Surely nobody is going to throw stupid money at Spurs now for him. If they do, Spurs would themselves be stupid not to accept it, especially with the other, younger, strikers in the squad.
Click to expand...

People over-do the whole "Kane has injuries" thing. He hasn't for a long time now, and tends to only pick them up by being an all-action player, rather than pulling up on a sprint or such.
Since his first full season in 2014/15, up until the end of last season, he's played 360 games in all club competitions. That's an average of 45 games per season. If he didn't play another game this season, that average would only go down to 43 (387/9).

He'd also have a record of 260 goals in 387 games in all competitions at club level. I don't think anyone turns their nose up at that - especially when he's a player that tends to have no reliance on pace
 
f.t.r.s said:
They also did it with van persie and that worked out pretty well
Click to expand...
The difference for me is Van Persie was a striker who played like the strikers they were already using but better. That's why I'm saying get Osimhen. Kane will require a rethink and this is why, in part at least, the Ronaldo addition went so poorly. I mean it isn't a surprise Rashford was much better either side of him coming and going for example. I just think it's a bad fit for what they're doing right now. And they're good enough to not feel the need to make sweeping changes.
 

TheBigIguana said:
The difference for me is Van Persie was a striker who played like the strikers they were already using but better. That's why I'm saying get Osimhen. Kane will require a rethink and this is why, in part at least, the Ronaldo addition went so poorly. I mean it isn't a surprise Rashford was much better either side of him coming and going for example. I just think it's a bad fit for what they're doing right now. And they're good enough to not feel the need to make sweeping changes.
Click to expand...
Only gotta look at city
Haaland has actually made them worse
 
?
He might be able to say he has played in the Champions League, but was it really worth it for him. Should have stayed here where he was adored and been a legend, and just got his glory moments for his country.
 

HalfTimeSayers said:
?
He might be able to say he has played in the Champions League, but was it really worth it for him. Should have stayed here where he was adored and been a legend, and just got his glory moments for his country.
Click to expand...
Can't blame the guy for wanting away from the shambles that is EFC.

However, Spurs wasn't the right move in my opinion.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register
Back
Top