2018/19 Richarlison

[havrey0123]

Don’t talk silly we’ve already spoilt the transfer window by paying 40m for the lad according to Paul Merson. I’ll look forward to seeing his reaction on Soccer Saturday next week when they show Richarlison’s goals whilst previewing our game.

 

[catcherintherye]

I know, sorry my figures are wrong. The true figures paint a worse picture haha. I’ll try and keep it to Richarlison as much as possible - in isolation of just one position alone they’ve spent 50% more than we did buying Richarlison - and not including the wages they are paying for both players. They’ve upgraded on Snodgrass. Antonio still likely to see game time as Lanzini (injured) & Mario (loan expired). Could probably say they’ve added pace in Anderson.

Diop didn’t feature, Balbuena looks plop, Wilshere and Noble look a weird pair no height or physicality there. Strange they sold Kouyaté - think they look worse centrally with no bite - Carlos Sanchez is one of the worst players I’ve ever seen.

So yeah, thanks for bearing with me whilst I went on that laying into West Ham tangent - And Richarlison is awesome.

Losing Kouyate will be a big loss as he gives them something the rest of their midfield lack.

 

[Darth Toffeeman]

I think they paid a bit more than that actually mate. Anderson was over 40 million and 18 on Yarmelenko. As you say both should be in their prime while Richarlinson is some way off. As an aside West Ham are in big trouble.

Yarmelenko and Wiltshire are the kind of signings we would have made under Koeman/Allardyce. Whether that is down to those 2 or Walsh it is hugely satisfying to see the quality of a Richarlison instead, especially with years of growth ahead of him.

West Ham looked absolutely terrible. They could be in trouble this season.

 

[blulouie]

Classy , Humble fella.

 

[catcherintherye]

Yarmelenko and Wiltshire are the kind of signings we would have made under Koeman/Allardyce. Whether that is down to those 2 or Walsh it is hugely satisfying to see the quality of a Richarlison instead, especially with years of growth ahead of him.

West Ham looked absolutely terrible. They could be in trouble this season.

Yes I agree with that entirely mate, I know we were heavily linked with Wilshire. They seemed to have collected quite a talented group of individuals without considering how they will play as a team, which sounds familiar.

 

[Goat]

100% a City player this time next year.

 

[catcherintherye]

100% a City player this time next year.

For a hefty profit if he is though mate. I think will be gone within 2 years, but we will get 100 million is for him.

 

[ganistuk]

100% a City player this time next year.

Disagree. As long as Silva is here, he’ll be here.

 

[Goat]

Disagree. As long as Silva is here, he’ll be here.

Silva will be going with him after we win the treble.

 

[Shibbywiggles]

Disagree. As long as Silva is here, he’ll be here.

He does seem to be Silva’s boy tbf. Basically it’s up to us to match the ambitions of these players like Charli over the next couple of years. If we’re still ‘best of the rest’ in a couple years though I’m sure he’ll be off to win stuff elsewhere if he’s consistent in these kind of performances... his work rate and determination on his debut alone was something else

 

[allen]

Disagree. As long as Silva is here, he’ll be here.

Silva will be going with him after we win the treble.

Happy for both of these things to be true.

 

[DualityNSNO]

Sorry if it's been posted.

 

[technojoe]

100% a City player this time next year.

UTFT

 

[BlueToff]

I do like Gylfi, but bloody hell, we should have given this boy the No.10.

 

[Goat]

I do like Gylfi, but bloody hell, we should have given this boy the No.10.

Strange that he "picked" 30, at the time 8 was available.