There were idiots, let it be said.
Lukaku was the best striker we had since Graeme Sharp - and the best finisher since Gary Lineker. Some obsessed over his heavy first touch. I mean, he was a flawed player, never elegant, but feel those goals.
Except, of course, in the cup semi-final where I feel he met something of a personal glass ceiling that he has never really broken since in the decisive games he has played for Belgium, United, and Chelsea. Great for Inter, though.
However, his biggest "crime" was to not "get us". This seems to be a huge thing at a club like ours where sustained success have been on leave since the 1980s. Richarlison, a very different but also much less effective player, connects with some fans because there is a perception that he "gets us". Certainly, he has spoken in much more affectionate tones about the club than Big Rom ever did. Does it matter? It probably shouldn't in a world where Richarlison's good grace and manners will mean nothing when a truly enticing offer comes in to play on a higher stage. But at a club where success is almost a dirty word now, associated with "them across the park" and the nouveau riche club in Manchester, then these "connections" cut through for some.