June 2024.Anybody any idea when his contract runs out?
He'll either extend or leave this summer.
Probably the latter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
June 2024.Anybody any idea when his contract runs out?
Will be gone by end of transfer window if no contract extension.June 2024.
He'll either extend or leave this summer.
Probably the latter.
Which is what I saidWill be gone by end of transfer window if no contract extension.
Cheers for that. Suppose it depends on what the club have said to him but a contract is a contract and if we shifted others should we force him to stay? I reckon his enthusiasm and overall effort make him the one player we should go all out to keep.June 2024.
He'll either extend or leave this summer.
Probably the latter.
And a 300 mil sign on feeGive him control of the club Mbappe style
If we force him to stay we will reduce his transfer value (he will be cheaper for buyers with one year left on his contract than two). The question then is, by how much? If that reduction exceeds what keeping him would mean in financial terms (higher league position/avoid relegation/qualify for Europe/nothing), then it would be a mistake. So that's the calculation that must be made - and it assumes he would play just as willingly if kept against his will as he would before (which, even for a player like Richarlison, is fanciful).Cheers for that. Suppose it depends on what the club have said to him but a contract is a contract and if we shifted others should we force him to stay? I reckon his enthusiasm and overall effort make him the one player we should go all out to keep.
And a 300 mil sign on fee
Agreed. I wasn't saying that was the definite way to go but its a possible way forward. I do think that richarlison though would play exactly the same way as he does now as he seems like that kind of character. It's all guess work but first step as you say is offer him an extension that significantly ups his salary and then if he's not interested see how much we would get for him. If its significant (£70/80m) then probably take the cash but if its more like the fee we paid for him then I'd be keeping him.If we force him to stay we will reduce his transfer value (he will be cheaper for buyers with one year left on his contract than two). The question then is, by how much? If that reduction exceeds what keeping him would mean in financial terms (higher league position/avoid relegation/qualify for Europe/nothing), then it would be a mistake. So that's the calculation that must be made - and it assumes he would play just as willingly if kept against his will as he would before (which, even for a player like Richarlison, is fanciful).
I would certainly offer him an extension on attractive terms, but I think a refusal should lead to a departure. Cold hard logic has to kick in now.
The only way he'd sign an extension would be a cast iron release clause should the club fail to qualify for Europe.If we force him to stay we will reduce his transfer value (he will be cheaper for buyers with one year left on his contract than two). The question then is, by how much? If that reduction exceeds what keeping him would mean in financial terms (higher league position/avoid relegation/qualify for Europe/nothing), then it would be a mistake. So that's the calculation that must be made - and it assumes he would play just as willingly if kept against his will as he would before (which, even for a player like Richarlison, is fanciful).
I would certainly offer him an extension on attractive terms, but I think a refusal should lead to a departure. Cold hard logic has to kick in now.
Which is what I said
He'll either extend or leave in the summer.
Probably the latter.
I'm the same, surprised he stayed as long as he has.If we need to be pedantic in essence what implied was "yes but, but no but".
However, if we apply the 2 player for each position reckon he is already gone hence why Gray and Dele have been recruited. With Gordon all so being able to play on left. So for me he is gone and been gone for some time but happily be laughed at it he extends with us.
We recruited Gray and Dele to replace Richie? I hope not, we’re in huge trouble if it is. Those two and Gordon combined are half the player of Richie.If we need to be pedantic in essence what implied was "yes but, but no but".
However, if we apply the 2 player for each position reckon he is already gone hence why Gray and Dele have been recruited. With Gordon all so being able to play on left. So for me he is gone and been gone for some time but happily be laughed at it he extends with us.
I'm the same, surprised he stayed as long as he has.
Shame we basically wasted his time here.
Good Times, they weren't.