Ronald Koeman discussion

[bicycleheader]

No I do not. I call things as I see it. I speak honestly and I don't say things I don't agree with to cause a fume. I hate that crap.

So the posts that I quoted above joking how the 0-0 is the end of the world or the post this morning in the game thread referring to Martinez and the narky orange?

Not jumping into the mix and keeping it stirring?

Sorry, I am on neither side here and the threads do get derailed a lot lately but I don't agree with those that blame it all on one poster. It's a merry-go-round of a handful of posters keeping it going and IMO you would be included in that.

 

[jinkyali]

Ok, fair enough, but you STILL haven't clarified where you stand on us bringing a playmaker in.

Dave with respect you can hardly dictate / demand someone answers you on something.

You change your agenda/ignore facts on a daily basis.

 

[moyes cardy]

Woooo 30 mil

4th highest is a fact. Amount is irrelevant you can't say it's amateurish if those above did less. We're unbeaten in 8 let's be realistic.

 

[bicycleheader]

That has quite a reputation. I've not seen it all.

Don't bother, was ok when I was a kid but dated badly.

On topic. Koeman so far... 6/10

 

[bicycleheader]

Have to say I really didn't understand why we switched Davies and Barkley for the second half. Tom was dominating and being aggressive with his pressure behind Rom, and Barkley was enjoying getting on the ball and having a bit of time from the deeper positions. Second half we went right back into our shell and allowed them to control the game. Both Davies and Barkley went from really having a big influence on the game to not having much of a say at all.

I assume it was to play more on the break and get Ross into those dangerous positions further up the pitch, but if that was the case it really didn't work at all.

My stream was too crap in the first half to really get an idea of what the hell we were at, but Ross looked to be on the ball constantly. Not so much in the second half.

 

[Slippin Jimmy]

That's Koemans fault. That's why we are discussing it in the Koeman thread.

Not Koemans fault, I still feel like he's having to tell the board to spend, be ambitious, that press conference he was basically screaming out for the board to buck up their ideas.

 

[ianefc]

So the posts that I quoted above joking how the 0-0 is the end of the world or the post this morning in the game thread referring to Martinez and the narky orange?

Not jumping into the mix and keeping it stirring?

Sorry, I am on neither side here and the threads do get derailed a lot lately but I don't agree with those that blame it all on one poster. It's a merry-go-round of a handful of posters keeping it going and IMO you would be included in that.

I have Dave on ignore and have so for 3+ weeks. If what I say is contry to what Dave is saying, then it's genuine. Admittedly , I've seen one or two if his posts, but nowhere near enough for yet another if your insinuations to be accurate.

 

[ianefc]

Not Koemans fault, I still feel like he's having to tell the board to spend, be ambitious, that press conference he was basically screaming out for the board to buck up their ideas.

Good players aren't available (in the main) in Jan. Come back to me on September 1st. If you're still here.

 

[ianefc]

Don't bother, was ok when I was a kid but dated badly.

On topic. Koeman so far... 6/10

Points wise, what would've constituted 9/10 or 10/10?

 

[ToffeeTim]

Sorry guys but I'm not really seeing any posters overly complaining about the draw, so not really sure why you are winding up fellow posters and derailing this fine thread

I was only making a little quip mate. I like the banter with Dave and whilst I rarely agree, I enjoy his contribution!

 

[JLW]

Don't bother, was ok when I was a kid but dated badly.

On topic. Koeman so far... 6/10

7/20

 

[bicycleheader]

I have Dave on ignore and have so for 3+ weeks. If what I say is contry to what Dave is saying, then it's genuine. Admittedly m, I've seen one or two if his posts, but nowhere near enough for yet another if your insinuations to be accurate.

Good start. But if you're making wind up comments like those a page back you are still taking part in the dance. I don't see how you can complain about one poster being a WUM and make WUM posts yourself?

It's fine to me like as it's often entertaining, the forum half runs on wind-ups but IMO there's a bit of hipocrasy from many of the posters who seem to dislike the cantankerous citrus the most. Thats all.

You've said insinuations now twice to me. There's none Ian. I'm telling you quite clearly really.

 

[bicycleheader]

I was only making a little quip mate. I like the banter with Dave and whilst I rarely agree, I enjoy his contribution!

Fair enough. Sorry Timothy

 

[bicycleheader]

7/20

20/20

Like the vision of the playmaker our current and previous manager have failed to buy

 

[JLW]

20/20

Like the vision of the playmaker our current and previous manager have failed to buy

We will get our man in the summer mate. Who I don't know?