Simon Buttle
Player Valuation: £60m
Anyone who has a full sized portrait of themselves is defo a wrong un.Rodgers has always been a fraud, from his three envelopes onwards. He’s got away with it until now, and now he doesn’t have a clue….,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone who has a full sized portrait of themselves is defo a wrong un.Rodgers has always been a fraud, from his three envelopes onwards. He’s got away with it until now, and now he doesn’t have a clue….,
Didn’t know that….how sad is thatAnyone who has a full sized portrait of themselves is defo a wrong un.
Surprised Scott Parker hasn't been mentioned yet
Talking of money spent, plus bottom or near to it, the E Midlands could be down one or two managers soonStill think Gerard is gone before the new year. Them absolutely fluking a draw against City doesn’t change that. For the money they’ve spent, they’re dire.
Pretty much sums up what my Leicester supporting mate says about him, he also reckons he’ll be due around £25m if the owners sack him ?!Hope so! He's a decent manager for a season or two but there's no longevity to his style. He takes zero accountability and repeatedly throws his players and superiors under the bus. Weasel of a man
what a gobshite
The lesson would appear to be: don't give top manager money (especially long-term) to someone who is not a top manager. Let him walk. He's not a top 10 manager, and paying him like one is a mistake as a consequence.Pretty much sums up what my Leicester supporting mate says about him, he also reckons he’ll be due around £25m if the owners sack him ?!
Not necessarily true. Whilst they will have to pay a fortune to get rid, they may be able to negotiate by paying him every month for the duration of his contract whilst allowing him to go and manage elsewhere. I believe a few clubs, including us, have done that.The lesson would appear to be: don't give top manager money (especially long-term) to someone who is not a top manager. Let him walk. He's not a top 10 manager, and paying him like one is a mistake as a consequence.
It's like overpaying for a player, but worse. No one will take him off your hands one step ahead of the headsman's axe, so if you need to make a change you're writing a huge check. If you're redlining the finances, you have to sell a bunch of high-value players to sack him. If the manager is just picking up a paycheck like high-wage bench dross, he can do a lot more damage than one bad contract, especially if his wage is twice that of your most expensive player.
Plain and simple: they made a huge mistake by not letting him walk earlier.
Talk about an egomaniac.... who honestly puts up portraits of THEMSELVES in their own home? No kids or wife or pet tortoise like, just HIMSELF.
what a gobshite
Not necessarily true. Whilst they will have to pay a fortune to get rid, they may be able to negotiate by paying him every month for the duration of his contract whilst allowing him to go and manage elsewhere. I believe a few clubs, including us, have done that.
Anyone who has a full sized portrait of themselves is defo a wrong un.