If we lose today - FS becomes only the second manager to lose 200 premier league games, behind another crook old wobbly head Redknapp.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Id have just let Unsworth finish if we couldnt get Silva. Couldnt have done any worse honestly. Sam got lucky with some nervy home wins over bottom of the table teams. The only positive in Sam was signing TosunWho would have been your choice?
But not Walcott? Unsworth would have seen us facing a real six pointer next week at Swansea.Id have just let Unsworth finish if we couldnt get Silva. Couldnt have done any worse honestly. Sam got lucky with some nervy home wins over bottom of the table teams. The only positive in Sam was signing Tosun
But not Walcott? Unsworth would have seen us facing a real six pointer next week at Swansea.
I have no problem with Walcott but just a big fan of TosunBut not Walcott? Unsworth would have seen us facing a real six pointer next week at Swansea.
Watford 1 Huddersfield Town 4. Swansea also won at Watford and at Palace. At home managed to beat the rs and Arsenal,a trick we consistantly fail to manage whoever we have in charge.Buts that's nonsense, anyone could beat the likes of Huddersfield and swansea at home.
The only enjoyable matches since fat Sam was appointed was the ones he had nothing to do with, west ham and in Cyprus.
But not Walcott? Unsworth would have seen us facing a real six pointer next week at Swansea.
Watford 1 Huddersfield Town 4. Swansea also won at Watford and at Palace. At home managed to beat the rs and Arsenal,a trick we consistantly fail to manage whoever we have in charge.
Bit like the Lukaku goals meant nothing, and we still would have finished 7th discussion.It's something we'll never know.But I think it's fair to assume that the players were in a better position once a permanent manager was in place whoever it was.The fact it was Allardyce was really down to the fact there was no real alternative available at the time (or at least not one who was interested enough to take on the job).Nope. We'd be in a very similar position if he'd stayed. His points per game ratio significantly trumps Donald Allardyce, albeit over a short period. Our home form was always fine. There's no way we were going down unless you like to indulge in nonsensical revisionism.
Bit like the Lukaku goals meant nothing, and we still would have finished 7th discussion.It's something we'll never know.But I think it's fair to assume that the players were in a better position once a permanent manager was in place whoever it was.The fact it was Allardyce was really down to the fact there was no real alternative available at the time (or at least not one who was interested enough to take on the job).
The clue was in the word consistant.Not really, we beat arsenal at home under both Koeman and Martinez
Failing to deny= hissy? And the fact that he "tanked" his remaining games...or maybe Watford are just poor? All guesswork really.Yet more fake news.
Silva was so desperate to join he threw one of the biggest hissies ever seen in football, so much that he tanked the rest of his tenure at Watford.
The clue was in the word consistant.