Do you also laugh when a man who supports a football team is allowed to referee their matches, allows an opposition player to stand on an opponent, kick another one in the nut cluster, and grab another players General de Gaulle's without even talking to him? The ref then went into a well know Rangers boozer and posed for photos with the Rangers supporters. When his decisions are highlighted in the media, the SFA compliance officer asked him to look at the decisions, but he told her he saw all the incidents, and there is no call cite the player for his actions.
At the very least, his behaviour has been unprofessional. I would have expected other managers to ask this referee if their players can stand on, kick, and fondle, opponents safe in the knowledge he won't take any action against them, or if this luxury is reserved for players from one club? Bearing mind he gave a Celtic player a straight red card for dissent a few weeks before his performance at Ibrox, it does look like he employs differing criteria when making decisions, depending on which side has committed the offence.
This situation would never arise in England, where referees are asked which team they support, and are not allowed to officiate at that clubs games. In Scotland, the media throw their hand s up in horror at this, as if it's some outrageous slur on the integrity of our impartial officials, who can't be influenced by any outside factors, according to them anyway.
A more cynical guy than me could get the impression if they brought this professional system that England employs up to Scotland, we'd be left with only a handful of referees to handle Rangers games.