HalfTimeSayers
Player Valuation: £35m
A new owner coming in claiming stability then improvement is not appointing a manager that hasn’t been involved in day to day management of a club squad since 2009. Laziest of links.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Saturday is not a big day for dyche, he won’t be our manager much longer win a few games or not. And it won’t be Southgate that’s just nonsenseSooner keep Dyche
If he gets few results .
he needs pionts out of the next two,
if we go into the break in the same position .
It's the ideal time for a new manager to get brought In.
Saturday is a big day for Dyche's future at the club, let's see if he is up for it.
Exactly. There’s no way a new owner comes in, wanting to make a success of things, and appoints a manager with an abysmal club record.I cannot imagine any scenario where this fella keeps his job. I don't think it matters what he does now. The new guys will do a full revamp and bring people of their own choosing in from top to bottom and I highly doubt one of them will be Southgate. That was just a silly internet rumour that went viral through repeating it.
Basking in the excitement of getting rid of them rather than respecting the jobs they've done.
I dunno.... They did appoint Daniele De Rossi.Exactly. There’s no way a new owner comes in, wanting to make a success of things, and appoints a manager with an abysmal club record.
January 23, Lampard fired, Gordon sold, no replacement.
If you’d said at that point that a manager would come in, keep us up that season, then keep us up the next season gaining 48 points whilst surviving two separate points deductions, all whilst turning a transfer profit every season, and would then deliver us to new owners as a premier league outfit..
I’d think the vast majority of Everton fans would have absolutely jumped at that outcome. That’s what Dyche and Thelwell have achieved, it’s not my opinion it’s a fact. If people want to cry about it in retrospect from the lofty position of financial security and PL status then they can do but it holds no credence for me. Bigger picture the job Dyche did was the one we needed, and if he hadn’t done it, there’s no Friedkin group and we’re probably leading the stadium in the championship in administration selling every playing asset we have. That was the alternative.
The job is done now Friedkin has taken over so I don’t really care what happens from this point. If we keep him until end of the season then fine, if the new owners have a manager in mind and want to change then all good as it will be a long term one rather than a panicked Moshiri interim suggested by an agent.
What's worse is that they gave him more than the rest of the season. IIRC the option was for him to take over until the end of season, he started off well, they handed him the permanent job, and the rot started setting in, now the person who handed him the job permanently is also resigning.I dunno.... They did appoint Daniele De Rossi.
Utd had the same rumour flying around earlier this summerI cannot imagine any scenario where this fella keeps his job. I don't think it matters what he does now. The new guys will do a full revamp and bring people of their own choosing in from top to bottom and I highly doubt one of them will be Southgate. That was just a silly internet rumour that went viral through repeating it.
January 23, Lampard fired, Gordon sold, no replacement.
If you’d said at that point that a manager would come in, keep us up that season, then keep us up the next season gaining 48 points whilst surviving two separate points deductions, all whilst turning a transfer profit every season, and would then deliver us to new owners as a premier league outfit..
I’d think the vast majority of Everton fans would have absolutely jumped at that outcome. That’s what Dyche and Thelwell have achieved, it’s not my opinion it’s a fact. If people want to cry about it in retrospect from the lofty position of financial security and PL status then they can do but it holds no credence for me. Bigger picture the job Dyche did was the one we needed, and if he hadn’t done it, there’s no Friedkin group and we’re probably leading the stadium in the championship in administration selling every playing asset we have. That was the alternative.
The job is done now Friedkin has taken over so I don’t really care what happens from this point. If we keep him until end of the season then fine, if the new owners have a manager in mind and want to change then all good as it will be a long term one rather than a panicked Moshiri interim suggested by an agent.
I'm a Dyche critic not ThelwellDyche and Thelwell’s critics
More time/until the end of the season if he manages to stop being a crap manager we can probably endure, through gritted teeth. I suspect he'd be given at least until January, but this might be the first time here where he faces pressure to perform, rather than just barely survive. New owners would mean new money/new direction, and what Textor asked is quite valid imho - can he do it with players that don't fit his only idea/way to play (in other words - improve as manager)? He's a known one dimensional manager who sticks to the thing he knows, that's not news, and if he continues to misuse players (and so on and so forth) - why would they keep him past this year?I know it's been a bit pants so far, but I do think people are quick to forget that last season was quite possibly the worst in the club's living memory and we still managed to stay up. Whether the new owners are prepared to give him time or feel he's done his job is up to them, but short term he's earned more time from me.
I see both sides, I see all the things about him that irritate people, they often irritate me. I don't think he will ever improve as a manager either. However, last season to essentially be safe with a couple of games to go, to get 48 points with the crap at his disposal, it's something we should not forget too quickly. Long term we do need to shake hands and move on imo I agree.More time/until the end of the season if he manages to stop being a crap manager we can probably endure, through gritted teeth. I suspect he'd be given at least until January, but this might be the first time here where he faces pressure to perform, rather than just barely survive. New owners would mean new money/new direction, and what Textor asked is quite valid imho - can he do it with players that don't fit his only idea/way to play (in other words - improve as manager)? He's a known one dimensional manager who sticks to the thing he knows, that's not news, and if he continues to misuse players (and so on and so forth) - why would they keep him past this year?