Not gonna go into this again as you're genuinely just parroting both of those points regardless of what anyone says anyway and you won't be swayed.
We've bought players for Dyche and the team is better than Lampard's, yet keeps breaking "worst ever" records yearly. That's not progress in itself, and he keeps bigging us up to go down regardless of players anyway.
It's weird how you weren't this defensive about Lampard, ever, but you'd die on this bog standard manager's hill, but you do you.
We've not spent money under Dyche.
I defended Lampard as much.
Because it's not about the manager - it's about the team not having the players able to score enough goals to keep us away from trouble.
I think Lampard had a better team because Richarlison, Iwobi, Gordon are better than what we have in the final third now.
If we’ve progressed under Dyche then why is 17th and 36-40 points still the objective?
Dyches full season was 48 points.
That's a significant improvement on the seasons before him.
Hipsters talk Potter. He spent £100m and in 3 years never increased Brighton by as many points as that.