Yes, more like 500 million (TV revenue x 5 is what i read).....and of course you can only spend what you have or someone will loan you. So it still favours the clubs that sell lots of shirts to third world fans. I expect there will still be a rule about it having to be sustainable to stop doping. 500mil is still alot of money.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
Villa voted against it too
This won't change a single thing.
Nope
Is this just the new UEFA FFP think i.e. you are allowed spend 85% of your income.
What a load of old TOSH.
I’m in favour of a hard cap. But it will be interesting to see how this plays out. If, for example, Bournemouth have the lowest revenue of £100m next year, and the multiples takes it to £500m spend.
Then the following season Coventry come up and their revenue is, for example, £50m and the multiples takes it to £250m
Massive extremes, granted; but will teams be expected to reduce overall spend by £250m in one year?? Is that even possible
Then the following season Coventry come up and their revenue is, for example, £50m and the multiples takes it to £250m
Massive extremes, granted; but will teams be expected to reduce overall spend by £250m in one year?? Is that even possible
summerisle
The rain, it raineth every day
chazzle_dazzle
Player Valuation: £35m
It works off the TV revenue I think mate, so I think theres a guaranteed minimum the clubs make.
Can see a situation where the big boys try to renegotiate the tv deal so the lowest club gets a bigger portion now to pump the cap.
I think it’s based on tv revenue alone.
Think lowest club gets around £100m currently. Can’t see it going down any time soon.
Goodison87
Player Valuation: £35m
Before it’s even out, good with them firsts us!
Rita_Poon
Player Valuation: £90m
They couldn't even be arsed getting this part right. Bells.
- Status