stones and barkley

[KaiserEFC]

We’re finally pushing forward and making our own way with things let’s not go back eh?

 

[Toffeelover]

We do need a defender, but I'm not sure Stones would be the one I'd go for

I like Ross as a player, but where would he fit in now we have the new midfield?

No to Ross, dare I say just a slightly upmarket Davies. As for Stones really not not sure on him. Why if he is good does Pep want shut?

 

[Tennessee Blue Mike]

Neither one will ever want to come back. I have a short memory as I believe many of our faithful do.

 

[carlos NSNO]

Roland Rat and Kevin the gerbil springs to mind!!!!!

 

[Bluestar]

​

Both these lads had their time with us and then took 'the grass is greener' option with their careers. I'm not sure trying to bring either back to Everton would be a good idea, to be honest.

​

Never want them back. That chapter is closed. Failing at top four clubs, and if that’s where we want to be, why would we take them?
Sheffield Utd, West Ham or Sunderland for them

 

[Mikey O]

Swerve, we've moved on and there's no place for Barkley. I was thinking about if all else failed and we were desperate for a loan CB then I'd take him but that would hinder the development of Branthwaite so it's a no from me.

 

[Rudolf Hucker]

Calls of “rat” overlook the fact that Barkley went from “diamond”, then in comes that fat headed ignorant ar5ehole Koeman, who replaced him with a £45 million Championship standard player. Not even his free kicks were better. Who wouldn’t be p1ssed off with that? He probably detested him. I know I do. I wouldn’t want to work for a man like that.

Stones was getting abuse from morons in the crowd.

Absolutely no idea if there’s any interest in either, but they would both improve the squad. If Carlo wants them, I’m in.

 

[Chegsy]

No issue with players coming back but both a no for me. Don’t rate Barkley and although we need another CB, I don’t think Stones is the answer.

 

[Dymak]

Stones is still getting games for Manchester City. He will stay there unless City bring in some new top class CB, which they appear to be stalling on right now.

I don’t particularly rate Stones and would rather us go out and buy a new CB for the first team, someone that is better than what we already have.

But if we are looking at loans to help us ‘get by’ due to the significant injuries we already have at CB, then I think we could do a lot worse than John Stones.

He’d have the chance to prove himself and if he didn’t, then we could send him back to City.

 

[tommye]

Pair of them couldn't get away quick enough.
Leave them to rot where they are.

 

[tellmema]

Emotions aside.

Stones, I'm on the fence.

Barkley, he has qualities that we could use and ones we don't have in the squad - a doucoure maxi. He'd give us options / more formational flexibility. Not a guaranteed starter but I wouldn't be against it.

 

[Yarrgh]

Stones and Barkley should be jettisoned into the sun.

 

[tim gabbott]

I’d buy Barkley back.. quickest way we could fill bramley Moore dock in with his lard arse, plus we would get a tick off world heritage for recycling old local junk

 

[orly]

i first said NO, but then Stones on loan why not

Good decision APN buddy

 

[arch stanton]

if Carlo thinks stones is the answer, I can live with that. Barkley is a headless chicken so Carlo probably doesn't even know he plays pro football