Of course, but we're talking about extremes here.Although this is technically correct, there still has to be some form of comparison. I agree that £45m for Siggy is a huge amount, but you have to look at other surrounding deals. Drinkwater being mooted at £40m, Neymar at £200m, Pogba (last season) at £90m, Clucas for £16m. Teams in the Championship are paying £15m for players now FGS.
Football, like a meal is of course subjective, but if your mate paid £300 for his meal it's not a fair comparison to say "you got ripped off because I got a KFC box meal for £5.99, and Hobo Jim eats out of the bins for free".
In the example I used of a meal, I meant that I know the area well and there are other establishments of the same type that are - in my opinion - better. I didn't say the other places were cheaper, I said better value. £45m isn't necessarily too much for any player just as £300 isn't too much for any meal, I'm talking about whether it's worth it for what you get.
The fact that some players have been sold for vast amounts does not mean that there's no value in the market, and that's what's consistently being missed here. People say Sandro will be a great signing but he only cost £5m. I've already used the example of Gueye as another player who is performing way above the level you would expect of a £7m player. To say that you have to accept paying huge fees simply because other clubs are willing to be ripped off is a fallacy.