@Barnfred 55
There are two opposite trains of thought here:
@Barnfred 55 would prefer us to (in general) keep players who perform well in the championship or indeed show potential to make it to our level (perhaps as a squad player). Or perhaps loan them out until their value reaches something 'interesting'.
@Eggs who feels that if players are loaned out once they have a few appearances under their belt (e.g Kenny/Holgate) then that should be a green light to sell
*both in general terms.
With Virginia and the rumoured Reading loan, every poster (so far) has agreed that its a great move to send him on loan to get experience with us having Lossl and Stekelenburg as backup.
Kenny has received mixed opinions with some suggesting
@davek that he should be usurping Coleman,
@Eggs stating at his age he should be in the squad or sold and others believing a loan could give him the experience to kick-on and be a good backup right back for us in 12months time.
Holgates was viewed as a loan to a sale...but for me personally i thought it was because we had 3 right backs and lots of centre backs so he got valuable game time.
Its really a difficult one,
LB - Robinson
CB - Feeney
RB/CB - Holgate
RB - Kenny
DM - Baningime
CM - Williams
AM - Dowell
WF - Onyekuru
WF - Lookman
Thats 9 players off the top of my head where decisions have to be made to keep/ loan / sell.
I am ALWAYS in favour of going for youth when its a high potential player.
But, lets say that selling all of them netted us £60million and we had buyback and sell on clauses for all of them...would that be a bad deal?
If we had the same level of signings as last season, then i think thats the way to go.
However, there will be some cases (such as with Kenny) where hes proven himself to be good enough as backup and so perhaps deserves a full season elsewhere to see if he improves.
Its a balancing act.
In the case of Williams, whats the problem with selling him as long as we have a sell on + a buyback clause? I see no harm in that.