‘40m+’ so like 45m?
...if you like.
Of course it could mean 31m or it could mean 2 billion. That's why I said 30-40m+ it's a loose noncommittal way of putting a ball park figure out there when I don't want to put a specific number down.
So I don't really know why you keep on banging on about 45m When nobody has mentioned that figure.
Though yes I do firmly believe that we will spend 30m minimum on a winger.