Summer Transfer Window 2025 Thread


Goat said:
It doesn't????
Click to expand...
They were talking about it on A View From The Bullens a few times over the last few weeks.

They were saying that it looks like another year of losses for the club this financial year. With PSR staying on that would mean all 3 years covered will be losses for the club.

- £44.7m lost in 21/22
- £89m lost in 22/23
+ another expected loss this year.

There will be some written off as permissable, I'd imagine, and we should have increased revenue from the ground move, which should give some flexibility for spending. But it sounds like a complete rebuild will have to be predicted on low down-payments again, or maybe a player sale.
 

Dwight K Schrute said:
They were talking about it on A View From The Bullens a few times over the last few weeks.

They were saying that it looks like another year of losses for the club this financial year. With PSR staying on that would mean all 3 years covered will be losses for the club.

- £44.7m lost in 21/22
- £89m lost in 22/23
+ another expected loss this year.

There will be some written off as permissable, I'd imagine, and we should have increased revenue from the ground move, which should give some flexibility for spending. But it sounds like a complete rebuild will have to be predicted on low down-payments again, or maybe a player sale.
Click to expand...
Surely most of those loses are Stadium related tho.

I mean we need around 12 new players, so it's certainly gonna be a challenge.
 
I wonder if we take a gamble on Johan Bakayoko from PSV? Undoubtedly talented still despite being dropped for Perisic of late. We've been linked in the past and I think we could negotiate a cheaper fee this summer.
 
Zatara said:
I echo this question.

Because it sounds extremely foolish and a massive missed opportunity.
Click to expand...

Why is it foolish and a missed opportunity?

Did you not read this bit?
' The reasoning is that the asking price for younger players is currently too inflated and poor value in terms of associated risk, with us having limited funds to carry out a large overhaul.'
 
Dwight K Schrute said:
They were talking about it on A View From The Bullens a few times over the last few weeks.

They were saying that it looks like another year of losses for the club this financial year. With PSR staying on that would mean all 3 years covered will be losses for the club.

- £44.7m lost in 21/22
- £89m lost in 22/23
+ another expected loss this year.

There will be some written off as permissable, I'd imagine, and we should have increased revenue from the ground move, which should give some flexibility for spending. But it sounds like a complete rebuild will have to be predicted on low down-payments again, or maybe a player sale.
Click to expand...
did they say anything about whether this summer's spending could be predicated by the money received from a potential sale of branthwaite?
 

Raino85 said:
Why is it foolish and a missed opportunity?

Did you not read this bit?
' The reasoning is that the asking price for younger players is currently too inflated and poor value in terms of associated risk, with us having limited funds to carry out a large overhaul.'
Click to expand...
That doesn't explain why we can't spend 100m on 19 year Tyler Dibling doh.

/s
 
Dwight K Schrute said:
They were talking about it on A View From The Bullens a few times over the last few weeks.

They were saying that it looks like another year of losses for the club this financial year. With PSR staying on that would mean all 3 years covered will be losses for the club.

- £44.7m lost in 21/22
- £89m lost in 22/23
+ another expected loss this year.

There will be some written off as permissable, I'd imagine, and we should have increased revenue from the ground move, which should give some flexibility for spending. But it sounds like a complete rebuild will have to be predicted on low down-payments again, or maybe a player sale.
Click to expand...
So when in January it said we were fine regrading PSR, what period was that covering because that’s confusing. I presume we must have been in profit for 20/21??? Also aren’t the accounts due soon, which would be 23/24 and going off them figures, we could be 25mil in profit and still be over. Then you have this year 24/25 ending on June 30th, so from July 1st which will be 25/26. The two years you’ve posted will come off???

So with all the new financial improvements, stadium, debt reduction, reduced interest payments, better sponsorship deals, naming rights deal. I’d expect us to spend some money this summer. As these recent accounts are 2 yrs behind and while there’s hearsay, nobody actually knows the true figures. And from July 1st we have till June 30th the following year to balance that accounting year. Add into the fact PSR is going and getting replaced, it all adds up to I haven’t a clue.

I’m just hopeful that are new team in charge of the club have some brains, unlike the last bunch and can come up with some clever accounting, to help us kick on. Or maybe just sell goodison to the ladies team
 
Goat said:
Surely most of those loses are Stadium related tho.

I mean we need around 12 new players, so it's certainly gonna be a challenge.
Click to expand...
Yeah. As bleak as it sounds, I'm sure we'll have money to spend. But, I was not expecting the financial picture to still be so bleak tbh.

Will still be a tight one this summer. For example, I've got a horrible feeling we might consider it cheaper to try again to keep some out of contract players we really should be moving on, rather than buying new players. People like DCL.

I suspect we'll have to consider a sale. Although, on the plus side, Bobble did say that all the media stories about Branthwaite pushing for a move for the sake of his England career are nonesense.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top