Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

The 2015 Popularity Contest (aka UK General Election )

Who will you be voting for?

  • Tory

    Votes: 38 9.9%
  • Diet Tory (Labour)

    Votes: 132 34.3%
  • Tory Zero (Greens)

    Votes: 44 11.4%
  • Extra Tory with lemon (UKIP)

    Votes: 40 10.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 9 2.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 31 8.1%
  • Cheese on toast

    Votes: 91 23.6%

  • Total voters
    385
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Potentially it could be a huge electoral issue - the Conservatives are broadly OK with it from the point of view of allowing greater private involvement and competition in Government tenders, but are unhappy that the negotiations are taking place at EU level. Labour should be anti TTIP but have not said. The problem for both is that it potentially plays into the hands of UKIP and the Euro-sceptics, hence they'd rather ignore it until after the election.

Only the Germans are currently against the TTIP proposals as stand, but negotiations are set to continue probably for another 12-18 months.

Other than the negotiation happening at EU level, what's UKIPs beef with it?
 
Potentially it could be a huge electoral issue - the Conservatives are broadly OK with it from the point of view of allowing greater private involvement and competition in Government tenders, but are unhappy that the negotiations are taking place at EU level. Labour should be anti TTIP but have not said. The problem for both is that it potentially plays into the hands of UKIP and the Euro-sceptics, hence they'd rather ignore it until after the election.

Only the Germans are currently against the TTIP proposals as stand, but negotiations are set to continue probably for another 12-18 months.

I see. That makes sense. On balance, if the Germans are anti it, then I would be suspicious of it myself.
 
Other than the negotiation happening at EU level, what's UKIPs beef with it?

Probably none. But that , (the EU bit). annoys me a bit if I am honest. Unless I am reading it wrong, the EU is kind of having a say in how we decide how contracts with the NHS should be framed. I think.

Which in a way, they already do I guess.
 
Probably none. But that , (the EU bit). annoys me a bit if I am honest. Unless I am reading it wrong, the EU is kind of having a say in how we decide how contracts with the NHS should be framed. I think.

Which in a way, they already do I guess.

I can't really see the problem to be honest. It seems to be saying simply that the state cannot discriminate against anyone bidding for a government tender (ie by forbidding certain organisations from bidding). It's still up to the buyer to choose whom they deem most appropriate/best value surely? I can't imagine it's going to legislate that the state has to accept bids from whoever decides to bid. That would be pretty illogical, and the likes of the French tend to be much more statist than we are.
 

I can't really see the problem to be honest. It seems to be saying simply that the state cannot discriminate against anyone bidding for a government tender (ie by forbidding certain organisations from bidding). It's still up to the buyer to choose whom they deem most appropriate/best value surely? I can't imagine it's going to legislate that the state has to accept bids from whoever decides to bid. That would be pretty illogical, and the likes of the French tend to be much more statist than we are.

Two major issues, will the US be open to competition to the same extent that the EU would be? and most importantly the ISDS provisions.

The ISDS provisions are potentially very damaging.
 
I can't really see the problem to be honest. It seems to be saying simply that the state cannot discriminate against anyone bidding for a government tender (ie by forbidding certain organisations from bidding). It's still up to the buyer to choose whom they deem most appropriate/best value surely? I can't imagine it's going to legislate that the state has to accept bids from whoever decides to bid. That would be pretty illogical, and the likes of the French tend to be much more statist than we are.

I thought it was that dead weird bit about companies who lost a tender being able to sue the Government for loss of earnings or something. But like I said, no expert at all, so probably on the wrong track.

But if Germany, who are pretty full on EU supporters dont like it, I would be interested to know why.
 
The Tories/UKIP can pontificate all the want about the EU, and 'how they control the UK', but Britain will be forced to abide by TTIP. That is unless they completely leave the EU, which they will not do.

Funny how Mr Farage and the anti EU Tories aren't banging the drum for Britain.

Cornish pasty ‘threatened by EU-US trade deal'
German agriculture minister warns that laws protecting regional foods - such as Germany's Black Forest Ham - may be at risk under a transatlantic trade agreement

cornishpasty_2659293b.jpg

If the EU food protection rules continue then the use of the term "Cornish pasty" would be outlawed in America under the trade deal Photo: Martin Pope

By Justin Huggler in Berlin, Bruno Waterfield in Brussels and Peter Foster in Washington

7:37PM GMT 05 Jan 2015

comments.gif
Comments


The Cornish pasty could be threatened by a flood of American imitations under the proposed free trade deal between the European Union and the United States, it was claimed on Monday.

Germany warned that the EU would not be able to uphold laws protecting regional foods under such a transatlantic trade agreement.

Christian Schmidt, the German agriculture minister, said that protections for regional specialities, ranging from Cornwall's famous meat pastry to Germany's Black Forest Ham, might have to be dropped as the price for such a deal.

"If we want to take advantage of the opportunities of free trade with the huge American market, we can no longer have every type of sausage and cheese each protected as a speciality," he said in an interview with Spiegel magazine.

Under EU law, protected regional specialities, such as the Cornish pasty, can only be sold under their traditional names if they were actually made in the region. Around 60 British products are on the EU's protected status list of 1,100 foods, alongside delicacies including Parmesan and Feta cheeses, Prosciutto and Black Forest hams.

Related Articles
Stilton, Cumberland sausage and Melton Mowbray Pork Pie are among British products protected by the EU but are not considered at risk because they are not imitated by American food producers.

The legal protections are enforced in Europe but not in America where immigrants, such as Cornish copper miners or Bavarian farmers, have taken European food traditions like the Cornish pasty or Black Forest Ham and made them their own".

Or maybe Farage and the anti EU Tories just dislike Europeans 'interfering' in the UK but are happy that the US through TTIP will set the agenda in many fields like health and education.
 

Two major issues, will the US be open to competition to the same extent that the EU would be? and most importantly the ISDS provisions.

The ISDS provisions are potentially very damaging.

ISDS is only triggered if the buyer (ie the government) breaks the international public law. So if the state abides by the law then it has nothing to worry about?
 
ISDS is only triggered if the buyer (ie the government) breaks the international public law. So if the state abides by the law then it has nothing to worry about?

ISDS disputes are held in international tribunals in the World Bank in Washington DC and are open to interpretation in a totally unaccountable manner. Hearings are in private, and domestic law is not taken into account.

The US have sued foreign Governments 127 times in the last 15 years, the biggest payout being USD 1.8bn to Occidental Petroleum by the Government of Ecuador. However only 15 cases have been brought against the US Government.
 
Simple really. The US have set conditions in the TTIP talks that will allow all public services to be open for tender and for the NHS to be further privatised. And because all sectors of the NHS have private companies running them, then all of the NHS is open to be further privatisation.
 
Last edited:
ISDS disputes are held in international tribunals in the World Bank in Washington DC and are open to interpretation in a totally unaccountable manner. Hearings are in private, and domestic law is not taken into account.

The US have sued foreign Governments 127 times in the last 15 years, the biggest payout being USD 1.8bn to Occidental Petroleum by the Government of Ecuador. However only 15 cases have been brought against the US Government.

That's making the assumption that the US are somehow playing the system though isn't it? It could equally be that foreign states don't play fair and deserve to be sued? It's hard to say with any certainty, isn't it?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top