The Banned Obituaries

[Joey66]

I certainly hope not, she’d squash me.

What a way to go heyho lol

 

[COYBL25]

This is true. I have a busy schedule of masquerading to complete..... allegedly.

Another fib, you get others to masquerade on your behalf.

 

[Deleted member 38674]

Another fib, you get others to masquerade on your behalf.

Delegate, delegate, delegate!

 

[Barnfred 55]

I certainly hope not, she’d squash me.

I so wish I could show her that post

 

[PITA]

I've got a good eye.

 

[MikeH72]

This is true. I have a busy schedule of masquerading to complete..... allegedly.

It’s second nature to you after all these years Cooks.

 

[Gwlacticos]

I got sixteen out of twenty on the tits.

 

[Catfish Blues]

I'd go for this myself...

BOOB TEST

Have fun guys

17 here

Might go back later and have another squeeze go.

 

[Joey66]

I got sixteen out of twenty on the tits.

Are you a sucker for them?

 

[SteveSC]

lol Again, I’m not making any comparison with the accused, the crime or their alleged culpability. The only comparison I made was with the general public’s subsequent anger at their acquittal.

Though, it’s interesting that despite you being so convinced of their guilt, they were found not guilty by an independent jury of their peers. Shows that trial by jury isn’t always right, I guess.

Sure I acknowledged that.

I mentioned already when asked all three jury members said they reckoned they were guilty but had no choice but to say not guilty as they all felt the prosecutions case were botched. That's why people were angry you fool. Do you know anything about any of the cases.

Either way it doesn't even help you. Your point is stupid. No one has acquitted you for a start. But if you feel they have my point stands. You are acknowledging you are a multi and the lads have not shown it. You used high profile killers to try illustrate your point and thats just weird

Thats what makes it all mad. In that case you could have literally mentioned any court case that favored the defenendant.

 

[COYBL25]

Sure I acknowledged that.

I mentioned already when asked all three jury members said they reckoned they were guilty but had no choice but to say not guilty as they all felt the prosecutions case were botched. That's why people were angry you fool. Do you know anything about any of the cases.

Either way it doesn't even help you. Your point is stupid. No one has acquitted you for a start. But if you feel they have my point stands. You are acknowledging you are a multi and the lads have not shown it. You used high profile killers to try illustrate your point and thats just weird

Thats what makes it all mad. In that case you could have literally mentioned any court case that favored the defenendant.

Just a thought.

Maybe he gets off on being attention seeking bellend ?

 

[Efcjake]

Sure I acknowledged that.

I mentioned already when asked all three jury members said they reckoned they were guilty but had no choice but to say not guilty as they all felt the prosecutions case were botched. That's why people were angry you fool. Do you know anything about any of the cases.

Either way it doesn't even help you. Your point is stupid. No one has acquitted you for a start. But if you feel they have my point stands. You are acknowledging you are a multi and the lads have not shown it. You used high profile killers to try illustrate your point and thats just weird

Thats what makes it all mad. In that case you could have literally mentioned any court case that favored the defenendant.

Known WUM is WUMMING. This is why I do what I do.

 

[Efcjake]

Nobody spots a fake tit like me eh @Keiran

 

[Yarrgh]

Is the bozo finally crushed and has he composed his leaving thread?

Or is he still flapping around and voiding his bowels like the FA will void his beloved current season?

 

[Deleted member 38674]

Sure I acknowledged that.

I mentioned already when asked all three jury members said they reckoned they were guilty but had no choice but to say not guilty as they all felt the prosecutions case were botched. That's why people were angry you fool. Do you know anything about any of the cases.

Either way it doesn't even help you. Your point is stupid. No one has acquitted you for a start. But if you feel they have my point stands. You are acknowledging you are a multi and the lads have not shown it. You used high profile killers to try illustrate your point and thats just weird

Thats what makes it all mad. In that case you could have literally mentioned any court case that favored the defenendant.

Again, you're talking about the specific cases. I was literally just referring to any case where acquittal caused shock and anger - that's it. Those seemed the most prominent three. There are no parallels other than the one I was seeking to make. I'm not making the point that I have been acquitted, I was responding to Mikey's assertion that he wanted me banned.

I've not assumed anything because as I've repeatedly said there's no case to answer. I'm guilty of lots of things but posting on here under a different name 10 years ago or whatever it was, isn't one of them.

Nobody spots a fake tit like me eh @Keiran

Easy, when everybody has posted the answers......