The Everton Board Thread (Inc. Bill Kenwright / Blue Union)

[chicoazul]

i have NEVER stated i knew ,directly ,of any offers.however, if you can admit that bill has lied, its not beyond him to lie again. add this to his incompetant running of the club,his own admission that he has had enquiries, its not difficult to see why people would believe he's
A) asking to much for the club
B) unwilling to sell,just wanting INVESTMENT,with him staying in charge
or
C) the club has been so poorly run ,and is in such s##t,he couldn't give it away.

personally, i think bill is doing what he is told to by others IN the boardroom, but thats MY opinion. and if he told me today was friday. i'd double check.

Theyre all assertions mate when he's said he's dealing only in facts.

 

[davek]

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/ever...bjectid=29099222&siteid=100252-name_page.html


puts popcorn in the microwave*

Best comment wins a prize.

"He said he hoped the club’s second honour in a week would bode well for the season ahead."

Do some people really read this stuff and think: "You know what, Bill's doing a bang on job here. He's scooped our second award for the season before a ball's even been kicked. Thank **** we have a successful local born chairman. COYB!"

It's frighteneing to think these people walk amongst us and are allowed access to sharp objects.

​

 

[davek]

Sure. FSF was bull****. Your point?

Now I have a question for you if you can answer. Show me the legit offers Wild Bill has turned down. If not, then move along.



Mate you're sadly mistaken.

Have I got this right: you acknowledge that the chairman of the club lied to his shareholders and wider support base about investment, but you're struggling to see how that's relevant to any debate concerning whether that same chairman has been telling the truth over his takeover statements?

Where does this fit into what you described as "the big boys conversation"?

Those weren't insults, those were simply fact based observations.

Big big difference.

Yet you deny the plausiblity of others stating facts based on observations and backed up by anecdotal evidence.

I think your argument - such as it was - is now a busted flush in this thread mate.

 

[sirblue57]

Theyre all assertions mate when he's said he's dealing only in facts.

and my point is, bill has lied before, for his own reasons, why would you assume he's not lying now?
i'm only going on the evidence provided by bill himself. whereas TX is going on the assertion that bill is telling the truth this time, so who is right?

 

[CarlosTheBaby]

He's worse than a kopite cos he's causing us damage.

Sooner this **** leaves the better.

 

[davek]

He's worse than a kopite cos he's causing us damage.

Sooner this **** leaves the better.

70% on here agree with you too mate. That's a fact!

 

[chicoazul]

and my point is, bill has lied before, for his own reasons, why would you assume he's not lying now?
i'm only going on the evidence provided by bill himself. whereas TX is going on the assertion that bill is telling the truth this time, so who is right?

Its assuming he would lie again, its not a consistent indicator that he would because he has mate. Then to stretch that assumption into scenarios you have defined yourself to match your agenda.

Just coaching your responses so that they're good for when Bill gets back on.

 

[sirblue57]

Its assuming he would lie again, its not a consistent indicator that he would because he has mate. Then to stretch that assumption into scenarios you have defined yourself to match your agenda.

Just coaching your responses so that they're good for when Bill gets back on.

your missing the point, bill lied for a reason, has that reason changed?
FSF was a means to an end, had bill been willing to relinquesh control we would probably be in KD and better off,
DK was a cheap manipulation to get a quick financial payday, the club would have suffered long term had it gone through.

looking at both scenarios you have to question bills reasoning, having supported G4E then pushed for DK,claiming it to be the "deal of the century" and what his motives were for his decisions. when you weigh up his actions its impossible to believe he has the best interests of the club at heart anymore. either he is conning the supporters or he is being told what and how to say. and when the one redeeming feature of his chairmanship is "at least we're not doing a leeds" it shows how bad things are.

 

[chicoazul]

Fair enough mate.

 

[pezzer1]

I cant even look at his fat face anymore without getting angry

 

[chicoazul]

I cant even look at his fat face anymore without getting angry

Love it!

 

[gooney]

There's only one Bill Kenwright
There's only one Bill Kenwright

He takes the money from everton
Spend it on leather thongs

Bill Kenwright can do what he wants

 

[chicoazul]

There's only one Bill Kenwright
There's only one Bill Kenwright

He takes the money from everton
Spend it on leather thongs

Bill Kenwright can do what he wants

Hi gooney. Good piece of prose that mate.

How are you today? I just had some chicken, it was ace.

 

[pezzer1]

There's only one Bill Kenwright
There's only one Bill Kenwright

He takes the money from everton
Spend it on leather thongs

Bill Kenwright can do what he wants

If we wanted a monkey ad have rattled the nuts. Run along bellwiff

 

[davek]

http://peoplesgroup.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/hello-world/