toffeejack
Player Valuation: £100m
He was Peter Reid on kipper I believe, he argued that Fellaini was ****e etc etc. Nothing more than an attention seeking troll.
sounds familiar
He was Peter Reid on kipper I believe, he argued that Fellaini was ****e etc etc. Nothing more than an attention seeking troll.
That's not really a productive question ... especially on a football message board. Would you like someone to chase you around GoT asking you if you are a professional football player (at the Premiership level) every time you've mentioned that you don't like it when Heitinga gives up another goal?
Also, team ownership is not a skilled trade. Most of them are skilled in another trade (to have the money and/or connections to obtain a club) but unlike the manager and players there is no element of football specific skill required. You could argue that a chairman/owner is the *most* reasonable person to critique (more so than players or managers). BK (by his own admission and based on listening to him speak with such wonder about basic accounting terms) is not especially skilled in business. Lots of great promoters (even wildly successful ones) are not great at business. They get people to run the business side and worry more about the production. There are people on this message board who handle larger and more complex businesses (hands-on) than BK. So I don't believe it's unreasonable for people to question some of his decisions.
I acknowledge there are some crazy types but I think a lot of the questions (for instance why our sponsorship revenue is so much lower than clubs with an equal or lower profile than us) are reasonable. It's not like people are saying "why don't we get as much as Man. U" ... we're asking why clubs like Villa, Sunderland, WBA et al are leaving us behind in many "off the pitch" areas.
If I had millions and in 1999 I saw a chance to get my club out of Peter Johnson's hands I would absolutely have done exactly what BK did. I don't care that he doesn't have billions -- at that time there wasn't a billionaire buying that Everton team. I don't have a crystal ball but I am reasonable sure we would have been relegated if PJ had stayed at the helm. So in that sense I give BK a lot of credit. So there's that and then there is "let's hire David Moyes." I'm not sure since "let's hire David Moyes" if he has done anything else which was noteworthy in a positive way. The absence of negatives (relegation/bankruptcy) are not really compelling positives. That's when you play a Chris Rock clip about how "that's what you are supposed to do -- you can't get credit for doing the things you are supposed to do." Has he done anything positive since then (aside from not screw things up as badly as Portsmouth or Rangers)?
The parts we object to are such slow progress with the business side (if not outright incompetence -- see: King's Dock which continues to haunt us and will for decades) and a perceived reluctance to sell. Hell, forget the business for a second, for being owned by a promoter I don't think anyone would consider EFC an especially well promoted club (either domestically or especially internationally).
Edit: Sorry ... forgot the time Stallone showed up with a scarf ... I take it all back.
Edit # 2: Wait ... Stallone came via Robert Earl ... I take back my take back.
That's not really a productive question ... especially on a football message board. Would you like someone to chase you around GoT asking you if you are a professional football player (at the Premiership level) every time you've mentioned that you don't like it when Heitinga gives up another goal?
Also, team ownership is not a skilled trade. Most of them are skilled in another trade (to have the money and/or connections to obtain a club) but unlike the manager and players there is no element of football specific skill required. You could argue that a chairman/owner is the *most* reasonable person to critique (more so than players or managers). BK (by his own admission and based on listening to him speak with such wonder about basic accounting terms) is not especially skilled in business. Lots of great promoters (even wildly successful ones) are not great at business. They get people to run the business side and worry more about the production. There are people on this message board who handle larger and more complex businesses (hands-on) than BK. So I don't believe it's unreasonable for people to question some of his decisions.
I acknowledge there are some crazy types but I think a lot of the questions (for instance why our sponsorship revenue is so much lower than clubs with an equal or lower profile than us) are reasonable. It's not like people are saying "why don't we get as much as Man. U" ... we're asking why clubs like Villa, Sunderland, WBA et al are leaving us behind in many "off the pitch" areas.
If I had millions and in 1999 I saw a chance to get my club out of Peter Johnson's hands I would absolutely have done exactly what BK did. I don't care that he doesn't have billions -- at that time there wasn't a billionaire buying that Everton team. I don't have a crystal ball but I am reasonable sure we would have been relegated if PJ had stayed at the helm. So in that sense I give BK a lot of credit. So there's that and then there is "let's hire David Moyes." I'm not sure since "let's hire David Moyes" if he has done anything else which was noteworthy in a positive way. The absence of negatives (relegation/bankruptcy) are not really compelling positives. That's when you play a Chris Rock clip about how "that's what you are supposed to do -- you can't get credit for doing the things you are supposed to do." Has he done anything positive since then (aside from not screw things up as badly as Portsmouth or Rangers)?
The parts we object to are such slow progress with the business side (if not outright incompetence -- see: King's Dock which continues to haunt us and will for decades) and a perceived reluctance to sell. Hell, forget the business for a second, for being owned by a promoter I don't think anyone would consider EFC an especially well promoted club (either domestically or especially internationally).
Edit: Sorry ... forgot the time Stallone showed up with a scarf ... I take it all back.
Edit # 2: Wait ... Stallone came via Robert Earl ... I take back my take back.
They were alright, I suppose.
Apart from when he kept telling people he had far superior footballing knowledge to them, which really just got boring very quick.
Not even a good wind up really.
The keioc lot on kipper didn't do themselves any favours.
But the thread where the kippers set up profiles on plenty of fish was pure comedy gold.
Kopites stood under the webcam in Mathew st wearing liverpool tops waiting for none existant birds will live with me forever.![]()
not too bad thanks MJ, just getting ready for bill to sell a player at 5 to 12 on the last dayof the transfer window mate.If you're knocking about here I might throw my pennys worth in from time to time
How you doing?
is right, good to see you on here.Now then Joseph......
We need to entice Billy Bullens over!
Can you please keep on topic with regards the thread please chaps.
In case you missed it, this 1 is all about the "Greatest Evertonian EVER".
5.6m Transfer fund in the last 11 Years.
Clap clap Clap.
were is he, havent seen him for moons
Just out of interest - who has ever said that about Kenwright? I wouldnt call myself a massive supporter of him at all. And I'm sure many others are in the same boat.