I'm not a 'lad' for starters, and if you were not having a dig at Kenwright, you should try to choose your words a little better. And if you find the opinion of a fellow Evertonian 'offensive' it is you who is being divisive. There are plenty on here who show genuine concerns about the club(just as supporters of other clubs show concern for their clubs) but on here, and, yes, on Kipper as well, too many people have no strategy other than to abuse one man. The Blue Union made a complete bollocks of a great opportunity to open a dialogue with the club...it would not have been easy but there was a great opportunity, but they seemed to do nothing more than make Kenwright look foolish, as if this was some sort of triumph. Just the mention of the word 'Kenwright, sets some people off on completely unreasonable rants. There was no harm in BK asking or suggesting that we deserved more coverage on TV. People HAVE been moaning for years about the apparent lack of airtime we get, the order of our game on MOTD, as if it was some sort of conspiracy, which it plainly isn't. It may be that Bills suggestions have no effect, but there is absolutely no harm in stating our case. The BU lost the chance for positive discussion, so now were back to the witch hunt. When you want to have a go at BK, apparently, common sense goes out of the window. I don't know a lot about the ESA, is it made up of small shareholders? If so, their vote carries little weight in the grand scheme of things, the majority of shares being held by the board. The best way to have your voice heard is by trying to get one of the board members on your 'side'....virtually impossible. From BKs point of view, it might be a good start to allow a representative of the ESA to attend board meetings? I still doubt whether much could be changed, however. But simply abusing people is the wrong way to go about things, thats for certain.
