ok, lets debate. the mixed messages from the board over the years , have meant that a lot of supporters do not trust them. this is a fact. another fact was the kirkby debacle was the boards last chance to ease a sale. this is despite the fact that it was a poor location,read the laughingly named Transport policy. the stadium design was critisised by a source not associated with KEIOC, yet this fact is ignored by supporters of the scheme. so look at the picture so far;
kirkby was the last chance to sell
it was a poor location and design
the board had minimal investment in the scheme, yet profited from it.
this is just ONE thing that sticks in my throat about the board.the final nail in the coffin of their incompetance, and for all the mistakes they have made, FINALLY getting a catering contract that works, well, thats just not good enough for me.look at the previous caterers, kit suppliers, etc etc .
we may be no better of selling to MR A.N.Other, but can we really be that much worse off?
kirkby was the last chance to sell
it was a poor location and design
the board had minimal investment in the scheme, yet profited from it.
this is just ONE thing that sticks in my throat about the board.the final nail in the coffin of their incompetance, and for all the mistakes they have made, FINALLY getting a catering contract that works, well, thats just not good enough for me.look at the previous caterers, kit suppliers, etc etc .
we may be no better of selling to MR A.N.Other, but can we really be that much worse off?